These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8231670)

  • 41. Adaptive averaging for improved SNR in real-time coronary artery MRI.
    Sussman MS; Robert N; Wright GA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Aug; 23(8):1034-45. PubMed ID: 15338736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rapid and robust pulmonary proton ZTE imaging in the mouse.
    Weiger M; Wu M; Wurnig MC; Kenkel D; Jungraithmayr W; Boss A; Pruessmann KP
    NMR Biomed; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1129-34. PubMed ID: 25066371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of averaging spatially correlated noise for 3-D radial imaging.
    Stobbe RW; Beaulieu C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Jul; 30(7):1381-90. PubMed ID: 21335306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Synthetic MRI of the brain in a clinical setting.
    Blystad I; Warntjes JB; Smedby O; Landtblom AM; Lundberg P; Larsson EM
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Dec; 53(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 23024181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Efficient bias correction for magnetic resonance image denoising.
    Mukherjee PS; Qiu P
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):2079-96. PubMed ID: 23074149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Boosting the SNR by adding a receive-only endorectal monopole to an external antenna array for high-resolution, T
    van Kalleveen IML; Hoogendam JP; Raaijmakers AJE; Visser F; Arteaga de Castro CS; Verheijen RHM; Luijten PR; Zweemer RP; Veldhuis WB; Klomp DWJ
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Sep; 30(9):. PubMed ID: 28574604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Regression error estimation significantly improves the region-of-interest statistics of noisy MR images.
    Juras V; Zbýn S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2813-21. PubMed ID: 20632592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments.
    He D; Zamora M; Oto A; Karczmar GS; Fan X
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):N445-N459. PubMed ID: 28786402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Computationally rapid method of estimating signal-to-noise ratio for phased array image reconstructions.
    Wiens CN; Kisch SJ; Willig-Onwuachi JD; McKenzie CA
    Magn Reson Med; 2011 Oct; 66(4):1192-7. PubMed ID: 21465545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cardiac motion and spillover correction for quantitative PET imaging using dynamic MRI.
    Marchesseau S; Totman JJ; Fadil H; Leek FAA; Chaal J; Richards M; Chan M; Reilhac A
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):726-737. PubMed ID: 30575047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging.
    Ruel L; Brugières P; Luciani A; Breil S; Mathieu D; Rahmouni A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):749-55. PubMed ID: 14975981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Multiple echo frequency-domain image contrast: improved signal-to-noise ratio and T2 (T2*) weighting.
    Yang QX; Demeure RJ; Dardzinski BJ; Arnold BW; Smith MB
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Feb; 41(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 10080294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?
    Buerke B; Allkemper T; Kugel H; Bremer C; Evers S; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Tombach B
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18692751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Diffusion weighted MR: principles and clinical use in selected brain diseases].
    Nistri M; Mascalchi M; Moretti M; Tessa C; Politi LS; Orlandi I; Pellicanò G; Villari N
    Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):470-9. PubMed ID: 11307509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Signal-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise efficiency in SMASH imaging.
    Sodickson DK; Griswold MA; Jakob PM; Edelman RR; Manning WJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 May; 41(5):1009-22. PubMed ID: 10332885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T
    Lee YH; Hahn S; Kim E; Suh JS
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 15(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 26902679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies.
    Schreibmann E; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):595-605. PubMed ID: 15890605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Apparent diffusion coefficient-dependent voxelwise computed diffusion-weighted imaging: An approach for improving SNR and reducing T2 shine-through effects.
    Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Martirosian P; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):824-32. PubMed ID: 26348708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. High-resolution small field-of-view magnetic resonance image acquisition system using a small planar coil and a pneumatic manipulator in an open MRI scanner.
    Miki K; Masamune K
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Oct; 10(10):1687-97. PubMed ID: 25549798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Brain MR imaging at ultra-low radiofrequency power.
    Sarkar SN; Alsop DC; Madhuranthakam AJ; Busse RF; Robson PM; Rofsky NM; Hackney DB
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):550-7. PubMed ID: 21357520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.