140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8231742)
1. Resistance to clinical computing systems.
Hannan T
MD Comput; 1993; 10(5):290, 299. PubMed ID: 8231742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The data has left the building. Software vendors hope physicians will turn to the Internet to access applications and store information.
Bazzoli F
Health Data Manag; 1999 Oct; 7(10):34-6, 38-9. PubMed ID: 10622922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Uniting practice management and the CPR.
Elson RB
Healthc Inform; 1997 Sep; 14(9):SS3-7. PubMed ID: 10170184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Creating a seamless IT enterprise: the rest of the story.
Bauer JC
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 16903656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electronic medical records: a 'workflow' in progress.
Briggs B
Health Data Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(6):64-9. PubMed ID: 12078398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Provider automation. Using the Internet to access records.
Cross MA
Health Data Manag; 1997 Nov; 5(11):56, 58. PubMed ID: 10174563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Workstations that work.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 1994 Oct; 24(41):40-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10138633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The future of healthcare information systems. Interview by Barry S. Bader.
Ruffin M
Health Syst Lead; 1994 Oct; 1(8):19-24. PubMed ID: 10140122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Leaving the paper trail behind.
Dragon N
Aust Nurs J; 2008 Jul; 16(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 18727263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic medical record implementation barriers encountered during implementation.
Tonnesen AS; LeMaistre A; Tucker D
Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():624-6. PubMed ID: 10566434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is your system in neutral when it should be in drive?
Nelson R
Med Econ; 2001 Apr; 78(7):156-7. PubMed ID: 11338239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Network support critical in choosing a lab system.
Watson S
Health Data Manag; 1995; 3(7):57-60, 63, 65. PubMed ID: 10143434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Switching from paper to computerized charts.
Lowes R
Med Econ; 1999 May; 76(10):157-60, 165-6, 169 passim. PubMed ID: 10537712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical use of computerized hospital information systems to improve blood transfusion.
Butch SH
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Apr; 107(4 Suppl 1):S50-6. PubMed ID: 9124230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laboratory results posted to wrong patient while using Cerner HNA Classic PathNet Foreign System Interface.
Health Devices; 2002 Sep; 31(9):347. PubMed ID: 12400225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Model of computerized academic medical clinic.
Sigulem D; Gimenez SS; Cebukin A; Cardoso OL; Chern MS; Ramos MP; Anção MS; Wechsler R; Serachi CR; Bracco Netto H; Goihman S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():768-71. PubMed ID: 10384565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why good hospitals get bad computing.
Bleich HL
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():969-72. PubMed ID: 10384604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gaining MD buy-in: physician order entry.
Ferren AL
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2002; 16(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11941925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical success factors for implementing CPOE.
Wolf EJ
Healthc Exec; 2003; 18(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 14503074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical computing standards ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) Committee E-31. A review of published standards and current projects February, 1992.
Megargle R
J Clin Comput; 1991-1992; 20(3-4):115-65. PubMed ID: 10183664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]