These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8232562)

  • 1. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
    Pascal CB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fraud case that evaporated.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
    Fackelmann K
    Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
    Pascal CB
    Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific reasoning and due process.
    Guenin LM; Davis BD
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The assault on David Baltimore.
    Kevles DJ
    New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
    Steele F
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New rules on misconduct.
    Holden C
    Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):593. PubMed ID: 2762812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.