274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8232562)
1. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A judgement fit for prime time.
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The fraud case that evaporated.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Palca J
Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Appeals panel reverses fraud finding.
Fackelmann K
Sci News; 1996 Jul; 150(1):4. PubMed ID: 11654356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Spring helps research integrity report resurface.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
Pascal CB
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific reasoning and due process.
Guenin LM; Davis BD
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New rules on misconduct.
Holden C
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):593. PubMed ID: 2762812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
