BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8232562)

  • 21. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Office of Scientific Integrity.
    Hamilton DP
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.
    US Public Health Service
    Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud.
    Stone R; Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5190):1468-9. PubMed ID: 7985007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scientific misconduct. HHS is still looking for a definition.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5269):1735. PubMed ID: 8650565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
    Poon P
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dingell rips Healy for 'obstructionism'.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1992 Dec; 258(5089):1729. PubMed ID: 1465608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Scientific misconduct. Investigations on trial in a Texas court.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5404):913-4. PubMed ID: 10075554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Of whistleblowers, investigators, and judges.
    Scarr S; Ernhart CB
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 11652255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NIH finds fraud in cell paper.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552-4. PubMed ID: 2011731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.