These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8233432)

  • 1. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage HM; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 8233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage MH; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 8233433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of digital dental radiograph imaging systems.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Pilgram TK; Shrout MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):661-8. PubMed ID: 2234888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digitizing of radiographs with a roller-type CCD scanner.
    Chen SK; Chiang TC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):719-24. PubMed ID: 9195630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.
    Halpern EJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 7734527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    J Dent; 1995 Aug; 23(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 7629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographic system.
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Kelly MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8181653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography.
    Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
    Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A comparison between endoral radiography and electronic magnification of digital orthopantomography].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7501826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digitizing pediatric chest radiographs: comparison of low-cost, commercial off-the-shelf technologies.
    Ruess L; Uyehara CF; Shiels KC; Cho KH; O'Connor SC; Person DA; Whitton RK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Dec; 31(12):841-7. PubMed ID: 11727017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.