These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8233433)

  • 1. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage MH; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 8233433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage HM; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 8233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of digital dental radiograph imaging systems.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Pilgram TK; Shrout MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):661-8. PubMed ID: 2234888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
    Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographic system.
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Kelly MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8181653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
    Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Welander U; McDavid WD; Sanderink GC; Tronje G; Mörner AC; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8078652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test pattern for quality control of laser scanner and charge-coupled device film digitizers.
    Halpern EJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 7734527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
    Mairgünther RH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
    Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography.
    Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct digital radiography: preliminary review of three FDA-approved systems.
    Kademi JA
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1994 Nov; 22(11):48-9, 51-6. PubMed ID: 7760161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.