These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8233774)

  • 1. Comparison of gait using a Multiflex foot versus a Quantum foot in knee disarticulation amputees.
    Boonstra AM; Fidler V; Spits GM; Tuil P; Hof AL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 8233774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
    Struchkov V; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of prosthetic ankle mobility in the sagittal plane on the gait of transfemoral amputees wearing a stance phase controlled knee prosthesis.
    Lee S; Hong J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Feb; 223(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19278201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot.
    Schneider K; Hart T; Zernicke RF; Setoguchi Y; Oppenheim W
    J Biomech; 1993 Oct; 26(10):1191-204. PubMed ID: 8253824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait.
    van der Linden ML; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Li N; Paul JP
    J Biomech; 1999 Sep; 32(9):877-89. PubMed ID: 10460124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frontal plane pelvis and hip kinematics of transfemoral amputee gait. Effect of a prosthetic foot with active ankle dorsiflexion and individualized training - a case study.
    Armannsdottir A; Tranberg R; Halldorsdottir G; Briem K
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 May; 13(4):388-393. PubMed ID: 28974119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis in the sagittal plane of trans-femoral amputees before and after special gait re-education.
    Sjödahl C; Jarnlo GB; Söderberg B; Persson BM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Aug; 26(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 12227444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gait patterns of transtibial amputee patients walking indoors barefoot.
    Han TR; Chung SG; Shin HI
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 82(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 12544754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic and biomimetic assessment of a hydraulic ankle/foot in level ground and camber walking.
    Bai X; Ewins D; Crocombe AD; Xu W
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180836. PubMed ID: 28704428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.
    Fey NP; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Dec; 26(10):1025-32. PubMed ID: 21777999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle' damping.
    De Asha AR; Munjal R; Kulkarni J; Buckley JG
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 10():107. PubMed ID: 24134803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.
    Underwood HA; Tokuno CD; Eng JJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jul; 19(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 15234485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical assessment of hydraulic ankle-foot devices with and without micro-processor control during slope ambulation in trans-femoral amputees.
    Bai X; Ewins D; Crocombe AD; Xu W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205093. PubMed ID: 30289921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the International Committee of the Red Cross foot with the solid ankle cushion heel foot during gait: a randomized double-blind study.
    Turcot K; Sagawa Y; Lacraz A; Lenoir J; Assal M; Armand S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1490-7. PubMed ID: 23578592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor.
    Postema K; Hermens HJ; de Vries J; Koopman HF; Eisma WH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Apr; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 9141123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis on kinetic loading of the contralateral limb: a case series.
    Hill D; Herr H
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650375. PubMed ID: 24187194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet.
    Czerniecki JM; Gitter A; Munro C
    J Biomech; 1991; 24(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 2026634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanics of walking with silicone prosthesis after midtarsal (Chopart) disarticulation.
    Burger H; Erzar D; Maver T; Olensek A; Cikajlo I; Matjacić Z
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jul; 24(6):510-6. PubMed ID: 19386403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal human locomotion.
    Hughes J; Jacobs N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1979 Apr; 3(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 471705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.