These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8234157)

  • 41. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss surveillance in Michigan.
    Reilly MJ; Rosenman KD; Kalinowski DJ
    J Occup Environ Med; 1998 Aug; 40(8):667-74. PubMed ID: 9729748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
    Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
    Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Efficacy of a computer-based hearing test and tailored hearing protection intervention.
    Hong O; Ronis DL; Lusk SL; Kee GS
    Int J Behav Med; 2006; 13(4):304-14. PubMed ID: 17228988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Noise-Induced hearing loss among professional musicians.
    Pouryaghoub G; Mehrdad R; Pourhosein S
    J Occup Health; 2017 Jan; 59(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 27853057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Awareness and knowledge as prerequisites for health oriented behavior].
    Zawadzka B
    Med Pr; 2002; 53(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 12701541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Knowledge and attitudes of a group of South African mine workers towards noise induced hearing loss and the use of hearing protective devices.
    Kahan E; Ross E
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1994; 41():37-47. PubMed ID: 8602542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An Internet-based tailored hearing protection intervention for firefighters: development process and users' feedback.
    Hong O; Eakin BL; Chin DL; Feld J; Vogel S
    Health Promot Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 23149759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hearing impairment and contributing factors among fertilizer factory workers.
    Saffree Jeffree M; Ismail N; Awang Lukman K
    J Occup Health; 2016 Sep; 58(5):434-443. PubMed ID: 27488035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Tactics against workplace hearing loss motivate employees to wear protection.
    DeJoy DM
    Occup Health Saf; 1994 Mar; 63(3):50-4. PubMed ID: 9156458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The noise exposed factory workers: the prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss and their use of personal hearing protection devices.
    Maisarah SZ; Said H
    Med J Malaysia; 1993 Sep; 48(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 8183139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of a low intensity intervention to increase hearing protector use among noise-exposed workers.
    McCullagh MC
    Am J Ind Med; 2011 Mar; 54(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 20721900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Attitudes toward use of hearing protection devices and effects of an intervention on fit-testing results.
    Smith PS; Monaco BA; Lusk SL
    Workplace Health Saf; 2014 Dec; 62(12):491-9. PubMed ID: 25207586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How to Choose the Most Effective Hearing Protection?
    Cirgenski T
    Occup Health Saf; 2017 May; 86(5):54-5. PubMed ID: 30285404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of improved hearing protection regulations in the prevention of military noise-induced hearing loss.
    Mrena R; Ylikoski J; Kiukaanniemi H; Mäkitie AA; Savolainen S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):997-1003. PubMed ID: 19086196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of "Train-the-Trainer" and expert training modalities for hearing protection use in construction.
    Trabeau M; Neitzel R; Meischke H; Daniell WE; Seixas NS
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18067179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Gender differences in blue collar workers' use of hearing protection.
    Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Baer LM
    Women Health; 1997; 25(4):69-89. PubMed ID: 9302730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficacy of technology-based interventions to increase the use of hearing protections among adolescent farmworkers.
    Khan KM; Evans SS; Bielko SL; Rohlman DS
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 28918682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predictors of hearing protection use for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White factory workers.
    Raymond DM; Hong O; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2006; 20(2):127-40. PubMed ID: 16758716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.