These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8234311)

  • 1. Model observers for assessment of image quality.
    Barrett HH; Yao J; Rolland JP; Myers KJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1993 Nov; 90(21):9758-65. PubMed ID: 8234311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-based model/human observer evaluation of SPIHT wavelet compression with human visual system-based quantization.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 15766693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.
    Abbey CK; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Mar; 18(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 11265678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.
    Rolland JP; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1992 May; 9(5):649-58. PubMed ID: 1588452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model.
    Burgess AE
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1994 Apr; 11(4):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8189286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of internal noise methods for Hotelling observer models.
    Zhang Y; Pham BT; Eckstein MP
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3312-22. PubMed ID: 17879795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT.
    Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
    Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification images for detection, contrast discrimination, and identification tasks with a common ideal observer.
    Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2006 Feb; 6(4):335-55. PubMed ID: 16889473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality, the ideal observer, and human performance of radiologic decision tasks.
    Burgess A
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jun; 2(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 9419600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.
    Myers KJ; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1987 Dec; 4(12):2447-57. PubMed ID: 3430229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background.
    Myers KJ; Rolland JP; Barrett HH; Wagner RF
    J Opt Soc Am A; 1990 Jul; 7(7):1279-93. PubMed ID: 2370590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT.
    Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects.
    Burgess AE; Li X; Abbey CK
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Sep; 14(9):2420-42. PubMed ID: 9291611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different ways of modeling spatial-frequency uncertainty in visual signal detection.
    Hübner R
    Biol Cybern; 1993; 69(5-6):457-62. PubMed ID: 8274544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple parametric model observer for quality assurance in computer tomography.
    Anton M; Khanin A; Kretz T; Reginatto M; Elster C
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(7):075011. PubMed ID: 29480811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography?
    Bouwman RW; Goffi M; van Engen RE; Broeders MJ; Dance DR; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ
    Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():95-105. PubMed ID: 28040401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-laboratory comparison of channelized hotelling observer computation.
    Ba A; Abbey CK; Baek J; Han M; Bouwman RW; Balta C; Brankov J; Massanes F; Gifford HC; Hernandez-Giron I; Veldkamp WJH; Petrov D; Marshall N; Samuelson FW; Zeng R; Solomon JB; Samei E; Timberg P; Förnvik H; Reiser I; Yu L; Gong H; Bochud FO
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3019-3030. PubMed ID: 29704868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified ideal observer model (MIOM) for high-contrast and high-spatial resolution CT imaging tasks.
    Cruz-Bastida JP; Gomez-Cardona D; Garrett J; Szczykutowicz T; Chen GH; Li K
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4496-4505. PubMed ID: 28600849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification images predict absolute efficiency.
    Murray RF; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    J Vis; 2005 Feb; 5(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 15831074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.