These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8234519)

  • 1. An electronic device for surgical glove testing.
    Fiala TG; Wrightson DM; Yaremchuk MJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Nov; 92(6):1192-4. PubMed ID: 8234519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of surgical glove integrity.
    Sohn RL; Murray MT; Franko A; Hwang PK; Dulchavsky SA; Grimm MJ
    Am Surg; 2000 Mar; 66(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 10759204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 4 different types of surgical gloves used for preventing blood contact.
    Wittmann A; Kralj N; Köver J; Gasthaus K; Lerch H; Hofmann F
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 May; 31(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 20334549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and performance of innovative surgical double-glove hole puncture indication systems.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):69-83. PubMed ID: 14510280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An enzyme-mediated assay to quantify inoculation volume delivered by suture needlestick injury: two gloves are better than one.
    Lefebvre DR; Strande LF; Hewitt CW
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 18155576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hazards to surgeons in trauma and elective orthopaedic surgery: use of an electronic device to warn of intraoperative glove perforations.
    Hamer AJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1992 Sep; 74(5):309-11. PubMed ID: 1416699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Needle puncture resistance of surgical gloves, finger guards, and glove liners.
    Leslie LF; Woods JA; Thacker JG; Morgan RF; McGregor W; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 8734073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing accidental injuries during surgery.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Hill LG; Thacker JG; McGregor W
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12825744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of glove puncture and skin contamination during caesarean section.
    Eckford SD; James M; Jackson SR; Hamer AJ; Browning JJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Oct; 104(10):1209-11. PubMed ID: 9333004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inadequate standard for glove puncture resistance: allows production of gloves with limited puncture resistance.
    Jackson EM; Wenger MD; Neal JG; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Emerg Med; 1998; 16(3):461-5. PubMed ID: 9610978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Needlestick fluid transmission through surgical gloves of the same thickness.
    Din SU; Tidley MG
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Jan; 64(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 24265256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeon.
    Mingoli A; Sapienza P; Sgarzini G; Luciani G; De Angelis G; Modini C; Ciccarone F; Feldhaus RJ
    Am J Surg; 1996 Nov; 172(5):512-6; discussion 516-7. PubMed ID: 8942555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardization of needlestick injury and evaluation of a novel virus-inhibiting protective glove.
    Krikorian R; Lozach-Perlant A; Ferrier-Rembert A; Hoerner P; Sonntag P; Garin D; Crance JM
    J Hosp Infect; 2007 Aug; 66(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 17688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical glove perforation during cardiac operations.
    Wong PS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Jan; 109(1):188. PubMed ID: 7880274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statement on sharps safety.
    College of Surgeons Committee on Perioperative Care
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2007 Oct; 92(10):34-7. PubMed ID: 17985836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen.
    Hartley JE; Ahmed S; Milkins R; Naylor G; Monson JR; Lee PW
    Br J Surg; 1996 Aug; 83(8):1156-7. PubMed ID: 8869333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a "no-touch" technique to reduce the incidence of glove perforation during suture needle adjustment.
    Orengo I; Pielop J; Ransdell BL
    Dermatol Surg; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1215-6. PubMed ID: 14725665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing accidental injuries during surgery.
    Edlich RF; Long WB; Gubler K; Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Wallis AG; Dahlstrom JJ; Clark JJ; Cantrell HS; Rhoads SK; Lin KY
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 21284595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.
    Thomas S; Agarwal M; Mehta G
    Postgrad Med J; 2001 Jul; 77(909):458-60. PubMed ID: 11423598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical gloves: perforation and protection.
    Tanner J
    J Perioper Pract; 2006 Mar; 16(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 16573022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.