These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8234868)
21. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dosimetric characterization of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter with therapeutic photon beams for use in clinical radiotherapy measurements. Ponmalar R; Manickam R; Ganesh KM; Saminathan S; Raman A; Godson HF J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(2):304-312. PubMed ID: 28643752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency. Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dosimetric Performance of Newly Developed Farmer-Type Ionization Chamber in Radiotherapy Practice. Saminathan S; Godson HF; Ponmalar R; Manickam R; Mazarello J; Fernandes R Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):NP113-NP120. PubMed ID: 26682769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Photon beam audits for radiation therapy clinics: a pilot mailed dosemeter study in Turkey. Yegingil Z; DeWerd LA; Davis SD; Hammer C; Kunugi K Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 21362695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A dosimetric intercomparison of electron beams in UK radiotherapy centres. Nisbet A; Thwaites DI Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2393-409. PubMed ID: 9434296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison. Johansson KA; Mattsson LO; Svensson H Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6283791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system audit. Gershkevitsh E; Pesznyak C; Petrovic B; Grezdo J; Chelminski K; do Carmo Lopes M; Izewska J; Van Dyk J Acta Oncol; 2014 May; 53(5):628-36. PubMed ID: 24164104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Aerrow: A probe-format graphite calorimeter for absolute dosimetry of high-energy photon beams in the clinical environment. Renaud J; Sarfehnia A; Bancheri J; Seuntjens J Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):414-428. PubMed ID: 29131344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams]. Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study. Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility of using a dose-area product ratio as beam quality specifier for photon beams with small field sizes. Pimpinella M; Caporali C; Guerra AS; Silvi L; De Coste V; Petrucci A; Delaunay F; Dufreneix S; Gouriou J; Ostrowsky A; Rapp B; Bordy JM; Daures J; Le Roy M; Sommier L; Vermesse D Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():106-116. PubMed ID: 29472074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preliminary results of a quality assurance network for radiotherapy centres in Europe. Dutreix A; van der Schueren E; Derreumaux S; Chavaudra J Radiother Oncol; 1993 Nov; 29(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 8310160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Proton dosimetry intercomparison. Vatnitsky S; Siebers J; Miller D; Moyers M; Schaefer M; Jones D; Vynckier S; Hayakawa Y; Delacroix S; Isacsson U; Medin J; Kacperek A; Lomax A; Coray A; Kluge H; Heese J; Verhey L; Daftari I; Gall K; Lam G; Beck T; Hartmann G Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9004361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams. Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MO-A-BRB-02: Facts and Fiction of Flattening Filter Free (FF-FFF) X-Rays Beams. Ting J Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3861-3862. PubMed ID: 28517518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of the IAEA standard holder on dose evaluated from TLD samples. Izewska J; Novotny J; Van Dam J; Dutreix A; van der Schueren E Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 8778826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Remote auditing of radiotherapy facilities using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Lye J; Dunn L; Kenny J; Lehmann J; Kron T; Oliver C; Butler D; Alves A; Johnston P; Franich R; Williams I Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032102. PubMed ID: 24593737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams. Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy. Fogliata A; Garcia R; Knoos T; Nicolini G; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Khamphan C; Cozzi L Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6455-64. PubMed ID: 23039680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]