These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8234951)

  • 1. Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy.
    Barke RP; Jenkins-Smith HC
    Risk Anal; 1993 Aug; 13(4):425-39. PubMed ID: 8234951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beliefs about radiation: scientists, the public and public policy.
    Jenkins-Smith HC; Silva CL; Murray C
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 19820463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International scientists' priorities for research on pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment.
    Rudd MA; Ankley GT; Boxall AB; Brooks BW
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Oct; 10(4):576-87. PubMed ID: 24954797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientists' political behaviors are not driven by individual-level government benefits.
    Zhang B; Mildenberger M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0230961. PubMed ID: 32374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ocean storage of nuclear wastes? Experiences from the Russian Arctic.
    Champ MA; Gomez LS; Makeyev VM; Brooks JM; Palmer HD; Betz F
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2001; 43(1-6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11601527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science, politics and ethics in the low dose debate.
    Baverstock K
    Med Confl Surviv; 2005; 21(2):88-100. PubMed ID: 16050241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):969-93. PubMed ID: 11077719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The CEECHE: a practical approach for reducing exposures and disease outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Suk WA
    Rev Environ Health; 2017 Mar; 32(1-2):3-8. PubMed ID: 27837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.
    Vraga E; Myers T; Kotcher J; Beall L; Maibach E
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Feb; 5(2):170505. PubMed ID: 29515820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived environmental and health risks of nuclear energy in Taiwan after Fukushima nuclear disaster.
    Ho JC; Lee CT; Kao SF; Chen RY; Ieong MC; Chang HL; Hsieh WH; Tzeng CC; Lu CF; Lin SL; Chang PW
    Environ Int; 2014 Dec; 73():295-303. PubMed ID: 25181579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Americans' views of scientists' motivations for scientific work.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 31621505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stakeholder perceptions of scientists: Lake Tahoe environmental policy from 1984 to 2001.
    Weible CM
    Environ Manage; 2007 Dec; 40(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 17846831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of nuclear energy and coal in France and The Netherlands.
    Wiegman O; Gutteling JM; Cadet B
    Risk Anal; 1995 Aug; 15(4):513-21. PubMed ID: 7480951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists.
    O'Brien TL
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):799-816. PubMed ID: 24048622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": the case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom.
    Costa-Font J; Rudisill C; Mossialos E
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1273-88. PubMed ID: 18631298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: attitudes of hunters and fishermen.
    Burger J; Sanchez J; Gibbons JW; Gochfeld M
    Risk Anal; 1997 Jun; 17(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 9232015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty & regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials.
    Beaudrie CE; Satterfield T; Kandlikar M; Harthorn BH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106365. PubMed ID: 25222742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Political life and half-life: the future formulation of nuclear waste public policy in the United States.
    Leroy D
    Health Phys; 2006 Nov; 91(5):502-7. PubMed ID: 17033463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived risks of radioactive waste transport through Oregon: results of a statewide survey.
    MacGregor D; Slovic P; Mason RG; Detweiler J; Binney SE; Dodd B
    Risk Anal; 1994 Feb; 14(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 8146403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception, reality, and the political context of conflict of interest in university-industry relationships.
    Frankel MS
    Acad Med; 1996 Dec; 71(12):1297-304. PubMed ID: 9114887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.