These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8234956)
1. Using decelerative contingencies to reduce the self-injurious behavior of people with multiple handicaps: the effects of response satiation? Realon RE; Konarski EA Res Dev Disabil; 1993; 14(5):341-57. PubMed ID: 8234956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses. Shore BA; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Smith RG J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 9103985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function. Iwata BA; Pace GM; Cowdery GE; Miltenberger RG J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 8188555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The establishing effects of client location on self-injurious behavior. Adelinis JD; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(5):383-91. PubMed ID: 9292931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct and collateral effects of restraints and restraint fading. Fisher WW; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hanley GP; Adelinis JD J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):105-19; quiz 120. PubMed ID: 9103987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does functional communication training compete with ongoing contingencies of reinforcement? An analysis during response acquisition and maintenance. Shirley MJ; Iwata BA; Kahng SW; Mazaleski JL; Lerman DC J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 9157100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures. Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP; Hilker K; Derby KM J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 8682733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of increased response effort on self-injury and object manipulation as competing responses. Zhou L; Goff GA J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 10738950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A descriptive analysis of self-injury in community settings: exploring behaviour-behaviour contingencies. Courtemanche AB; Lloyd BP; Tapp JT J Intellect Disabil Res; 2018 Dec; 62(12):1097-1107. PubMed ID: 29536583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products. Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using a stimulus correlated with reprimands to suppress automatically maintained eye poking. McKenzie SD; Smith RG; Simmons JN; Soderlund MJ J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 18595290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of implementing program consequences with a group of individuals who engaged in sensory maintained hand mouthing. Turner WD; Realon RE; Irvin D; Robinson E Res Dev Disabil; 1996; 17(4):311-30. PubMed ID: 8827841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Lerman DC; Iwata BA J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(3):293-319. PubMed ID: 8407680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of wrist weights on self-injurious and adaptive behaviors. Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Keeney KM; Blakeley-Smith AB; Worsdell AS J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 9652108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the functions of self-injurious behavior: a case of assessment failure. Sturmey P J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 25(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 7706511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of shock intensity in the treatment of longstanding and severe self-injurious behavior. Williams DE; Kirkpatrick-Sanchez S; Iwata BA Res Dev Disabil; 1993; 14(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 8316683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement. Hagopian LP; Crockett JL; van Stone M; DeLeon IG; Bowman LG J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 11214021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury. Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlates of interventions with self-injurious behaviour. Sternberg L; Taylor RL; Babkie A J Intellect Disabil Res; 1994 Oct; 38 ( Pt 5)():475-85. PubMed ID: 7841686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulus control and resistance to extinction in attention-maintained SIB. Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Adelinis JD Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 9216025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]