These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Acute myocardial infarction. Keys to assessment and intervention. Flood M; DiCiancia P J Pract Nurs; 1976 Apr; 26(4):16-21. PubMed ID: 1044706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Acute myocardial infarction, 1970. Evaluation by medical audit in five Minnesota hospitals. Fifer WR Minn Med; 1972 Nov; 55(11):1069-75. PubMed ID: 4669976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Adapting AMA/PSRO model screening criteria to PEP: pulmonary embolism or infarction. Buckingham WB QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1976 May; 2(5):23-8. PubMed ID: 823499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Adapting AMA/PSRO model screening criteria to the PEP methodology: acute myocardial infarction. QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1976 Jun; 2(6):14-21. PubMed ID: 823502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The modern treatment of myocardial infarction by coronary reperfusion: impact on the organization of care]. Grosgogeat Y; Artigou JY Bull Acad Natl Med; 1991 Mar; 175(3):385-92; discussion 392-3. PubMed ID: 1933463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reperfusion and reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction. Black L; Coombs VJ; Townsend SN Heart Lung; 1990 May; 19(3):274-84. PubMed ID: 2187833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of an audit program and other factors on door-to-balloon times in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients destined for primary coronary intervention. Lai CL; Fan CM; Liao PC; Tsai KC; Yang CY; Chu SH; Chien KL Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(4):333-42. PubMed ID: 19456296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing quality of care from the medical record. Fessel WJ; Van Brunt EE N Engl J Med; 1972 Jan; 286(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 5007152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The pre-hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction: a national audit is needed in New Zealand. Norris R N Z Med J; 2007 Jun; 120(1255):U2560. PubMed ID: 17546108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes analysis with case management. Cotham P; Cunningham B; Gilmer C J Cardiovasc Manag; 1994; 5(6):23-4, 26-33. PubMed ID: 10139236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A national audit of care for myocardial infarction. Nicholls M Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(13):f150-1. PubMed ID: 17007080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Hypothesis of the standard level of care for patients with acute myocardial infarct]. Bolognini M Prof Inferm; 1995; 48(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 8693010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrap session: critique of a nursing audit of pulmonary embolism and infarction. Shanahan M QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1976 May; 2(5):7-11, 27. PubMed ID: 823501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient satisfaction and its relationship with quality and outcomes of care after acute myocardial infarction. Lee DS; Tu JV; Chong A; Alter DA Circulation; 2008 Nov; 118(19):1938-45. PubMed ID: 18936325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apparently coronary heart disease-free patients in the coronary care unit: characteristics, medical care, and 1-year outcome. Brodin EC; Shahar E; Rosamond WD; McGovern PG; Sprafka JM; Doliszny KM; Luepker RV Coron Artery Dis; 1994 Sep; 5(9):737-43. PubMed ID: 7858763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emergency department triage of acute myocardial infarction patients and the effect on outcomes. Atzema CL; Austin PC; Tu JV; Schull MJ Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 53(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 19157653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]