BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8235643)

  • 1. ORI drops Gallo case in legal dispute.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5137):1202-3. PubMed ID: 8235643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Popovic is cleared on all charges; Gallo case in doubt.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5136):981-3. PubMed ID: 8235636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resounding echoes of Gallo case.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8950):639. PubMed ID: 7898185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HHS: Gallo guilty of misconduct.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):168-70. PubMed ID: 8380653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inquiry finds misconduct by virus researcher; Gallo predicts appeal will overturn finding.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(6):723-4. PubMed ID: 8380877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imanishi-Kari case: ORI finds fraud.
    Stone R; Marshall E
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5190):1468-9. PubMed ID: 7985007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The aftermath of the Gallo case.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 May; 284(5416):901. PubMed ID: 10357668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imanishi-Kari case. Marathon hearing gets under way.
    Mervis J
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1561. PubMed ID: 7777851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ORI and misconduct investigations.
    Bivens LW
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):593. PubMed ID: 8303258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case.
    Stone R
    Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
    Chubin DE
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.