These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8235810)

  • 1. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Bazrgari B
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Aug; 21(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 16678948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk muscle activation and associated lumbar spine joint shear forces under different levels of external forward force applied to the trunk.
    Kingma I; Staudenmann D; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16531071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An electromyography-assisted model to estimate trunk muscle forces during fatiguing repetitive trunk exertions.
    Sparto PJ; Parnianpour M
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Dec; 12(6):509-18. PubMed ID: 10598994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ISSLS prize winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: a comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Graichen F; Claes L; Bergmann G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(23):2585-93. PubMed ID: 14652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a stiff lifting belt on spine compression during lifting.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Suwarganda EK; Bruijnen TB; Peters RJ; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):E833-9. PubMed ID: 17047531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient analysis of trunk response in sudden release loading using kinematics-driven finite element model.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 May; 24(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 19285367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.
    Marras WS; Lavender SA; Leurgans SE; Fathallah FA; Ferguson SA; Allread WG; Rajulu SL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):377-410. PubMed ID: 7895740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Networks of internal trunk-loading activities under controlled trunk-motion conditions.
    Marras WS; Reilly CH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1988 Jun; 13(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 3175757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seated whole body vibrations with high-magnitude accelerations--relative roles of inertia and muscle forces.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Kasra M
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2639-46. PubMed ID: 18672242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of trunk muscles in generating follower load in the lumbar spine of neutral standing posture.
    Kim K; Kim YH
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Aug; 130(4):041005. PubMed ID: 18601447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of different levels of torso coactivation on trunk muscular and kinematic responses to posteriorly applied sudden loads.
    Vera-Garcia FJ; Brown SH; Gray JR; McGill SM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Jun; 21(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 16442677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 16288897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.