903 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8235826)
1. A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
Goel VK; Kong W; Han JS; Weinstein JN; Gilbertson LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1531-41. PubMed ID: 8235826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads.
Goel VK; Monroe BT; Gilbertson LG; Brinckmann P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Mar; 20(6):689-98. PubMed ID: 7604345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting.
Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct; 12(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 10549710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of muscle dysfunction on lumbar spine mechanics. A finite element study based on a two motion segments model.
Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2197-206; discussion 2206-7. PubMed ID: 8902963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration - a finite element analysis.
Schmidt H; Kettler A; Rohlmann A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):988-98. PubMed ID: 17822814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of posture in mechanics of the lumbar spine in compression.
Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M
J Spinal Disord; 1996 Aug; 9(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 8877953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Buck's direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis restores disc stresses at the involved and adjacent levels.
Sairyo K; Goel VK; Faizan A; Vadapalli S; Biyani S; Ebraheim N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 16959387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of removing the lateral part of the pars interarticularis on stress distribution at the neural arch in lumbar foraminal microdecompression at L3-L4 and L4-L5: anatomic and finite element investigations.
Ivanov AA; Faizan A; Ebraheim NA; Yeasting R; Goel VK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2462-6. PubMed ID: 18090086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical response of a lumbar intervertebral disc to manual lifting activities: a poroelastic finite element model study.
Natarajan RN; Lavender SA; An HA; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18708928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanical analysis of artificial intervertebral disc in a 3-dimensional finite-element model].
Ge L; Li KH
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Nov; 33(11):1041-6. PubMed ID: 19060373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.
Shirazi-Adl A
J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
