These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Always prepared--good service or exaggerated servility in psychiatry?]. Ebner G Psychiatr Prax; 2000 Sep; 27(6):261-2. PubMed ID: 11050730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [The treating physician and the insurance physician against each other?]. Järvimäki V; Haanpää M Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2457-8. PubMed ID: 12053339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [The doctor as an advocate for the patient in the insurance system]. Kokkonen P Duodecim; 1995; 111(17):1650-1. PubMed ID: 9273281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. What is the evidence for an organic lesion in whiplash injury? Gargan MF J Psychosom Res; 1995 Aug; 39(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 8568734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [A puzzling whiplash trauma]. Engelhardt R Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):Oa17-20. PubMed ID: 9499507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Whiplash. A specialist's view. Selecki BR Aust Fam Physician; 1984 Apr; 13(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 6743127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Is the insurance physician wiser than the treating physician?]. Juntunen J; Havu T Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2453-5. PubMed ID: 12053338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Problems involved in expert opinions on acceleration injuries of the cervical spine]. Wedig HD; Grill C Orthopade; 2006 Nov; 35(11):1187-8; author reply 1188-90. PubMed ID: 17421069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Testifying in child abuse cases. To be believed or not believed. Bennett T Iowa Med; 1997 Mar; 87(3):112-3. PubMed ID: 9119670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Physicians and expert testimony]. Befring AK Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 May; 124(9):1270-1. PubMed ID: 15131715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Medical expert assessment in social rights lawsuits]. Winkler H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):618-21; discussion 622. PubMed ID: 9064934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Medical expert assessment in social rights--responsibilities of the physician]. Kertzendorff KW Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):612-7. PubMed ID: 9064933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Medicolegal aspects of neurotology. Hart CW; Rubin AG Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1996 Jun; 29(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 8743346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Whiplash injuries. Bingham R Med Trial Tech Q; 1968 Jun; 14(4):69-80. PubMed ID: 5747373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Expert evidence in whiplash injury: interdisciplinary orthopaedic and biomechanical approach]. Magin MN; Auer C Unfallchirurg; 2014 Mar; 117(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 24504496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Whiplash injury of the cervical spine in the disability evaluation. A medical or legal problem?]. Gemmel HW; Müller-Färber J Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed Berufskr; 1984; 77(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 6429978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Perspectives and relevance of medico-legal work. Schofield ZL Man Ther; 1999 Feb; 4(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 10463020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Use of physicians as expert witnesses by the courts]. Befring AK Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 May; 124(10):1413-4. PubMed ID: 15195186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]