These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8236589)

  • 41. Adaptive speckle reduction for improving the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Crawford DC; Cosgrove DO; Tohno E; Bossi C; Kedar R; Bell DS; Kale S; Norman A; Bamber JC
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Mar; 14(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 7760467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion.
    Abd-Elmoniem KZ; Youssef AB; Kadah YM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):997-1014. PubMed ID: 12214889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ultrasound motion estimation using a hierarchical feature weighting algorithm.
    Lin CH; Lin MC; Sun YN
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Apr; 31(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 17317099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transform-Based Channel-Data Compression to Improve the Performance of a Real-Time GPU-Based Software Beamformer.
    Lok UW; Li PC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Mar; 63(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 26800536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Non-linear real-time adaptive filtration of ultrasound TI628A echotomoscope images].
    Barannik EA; Volokhov IuV; Marusenko AI
    Med Tekh; 1997; (5):5-8. PubMed ID: 9445983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speckle reduction based on Wiener filter in ultrasound images.
    Baselice F; Ferraioli G; Johnsy AC; Pascazio V; Schirinzi G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():3065-8. PubMed ID: 26736939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Filter based receive-side spatial compounding for veterinary ultrasound B-mode imaging.
    Liu W; Cheng Y; Liu DC
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):1193-9. PubMed ID: 24212013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultrasound speckle reduction based on fractional order differentiation.
    Shao D; Zhou T; Liu F; Yi S; Xiang Y; Ma L; Xiong X; He J
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2017 Jul; 44(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 28012088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [A new algorithm for ultrasound image speckle suppression].
    He L; Ha Z; Li CF; Wang JP; Zhou KY
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 33(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 19771886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Experimental Quantification of Noise in Linear Ultrasonic Imaging.
    Bevan RLT; Zhang J; Budyn N; Croxford AJ; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Jan; 66(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 30334790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using data and rate adaptive lossy compression.
    Gupta N; Swamy MN; Plotkin E
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):743-54. PubMed ID: 15957598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images.
    Bamber JC; Daft C
    Ultrasonics; 1986 Jan; 24(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 3510500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Compensation of log-compressed images for 3-D ultrasound.
    Sanches JM; Marques JS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 29(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 12659912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of hybrid speckle reduction algorithms.
    Forsberg F; Healey AJ; Leeman S; Jensen JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Nov; 36(11):1539-49. PubMed ID: 1754624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Image quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging systems: advanced B-modes.
    Sassaroli E; Crake C; Scorza A; Kim DS; Park MA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 20(3):115-124. PubMed ID: 30861278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Filtering and contrast enhancement of medical ultrasonic image].
    Chen K; Lin J; Li D; Wang T
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 24(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 17591276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Boundary enhancement and speckle reduction for ultrasound images via salient structure extraction.
    Xie J; Jiang Y; Tsui HT; Heng PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2300-9. PubMed ID: 17073336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Intelligent estimation of noise and blur variances using ANN for the restoration of ultrasound images.
    Uddin MS; Halder KK; Tahtali M; Lambert AJ; Pickering MR; Marchese M; Stuart I
    Appl Opt; 2016 Nov; 55(31):8905-8915. PubMed ID: 27828292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Nakagami-based total variation method for speckle reduction in thyroid ultrasound images.
    Koundal D; Gupta S; Singh S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Feb; 230(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 26721907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speckle detection in ultrasonic images using unsupervised clustering techniques.
    Azar AA; Rivaz H; Boctor E
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():8098-101. PubMed ID: 22256221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.