These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials. Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use of a retainer bar in lower full dentures]. Rignon-Bret JM; Pompignoli M Cah Prothese; 1989 Dec; (68):56-70. PubMed ID: 2700552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the acrylic resin pattern for the implant-retained prosthesis. Ness EM; Nicholls JI; Rubenstein JE; Smith DE Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):542-9. PubMed ID: 1307014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Carr AB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 1299642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the compatibility of elastomeric impression materials, type IV dental stones, and liquid media. Gerrow JD; Schneider RL J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3553549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Overcoming the complexity of impression materials: Part I. An interview with Alan Boghosian, DDS. Boghosian A Dent Today; 1991 Aug; 10(6):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 1930870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]