These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8241039)

  • 1. Computer-assisted corneal topography: accuracy and reproducibility of the topographic modeling system.
    Legeais JM; Ren Q; Simon G; Parel JM
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1993; 9(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 8241039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of 'power' maps to display curvature data in corneal topography systems.
    Roberts C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Aug; 35(9):3525-32. PubMed ID: 8056528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.
    Simon G; Parel JM; Nose I; Lee W
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 2043560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial and frequency domain techniques for segmentation of Placido images and accuracy implications for videokeratography.
    de Carvalho LA; Bruno OM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Aug; 79(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 16006006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Küchle M
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 10201589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of fibrovascular traction and pooling of tears on corneal topographic changes induced by pterygium.
    Yasar T; Ozdemir M; Cinal A; Demirok A; Ilhan B; Durmus AC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 12802349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating variability in placido-based topographic systems.
    Kounis GA; Tsilimbaris MK; Kymionis GD; Ginis HS; Pallikaris IG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):962-8. PubMed ID: 18049359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pitfalls of IOL power prediction after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia -- case report, practical recommendations and literature review].
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Haigis W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Dec; 219(12):840-50. PubMed ID: 12548468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of the inherent error in a spherically-biased corneal topography system in mapping a radially aspheric surface.
    Roberts C
    J Refract Corneal Surg; 1994; 10(2):103-11; discussion 112-6. PubMed ID: 7517283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK.
    Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal topography and myopia. A cross-sectional study.
    Carney LG; Mainstone JC; Henderson BA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9040463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy and reproducibility of the keratometer and the EyeSys Corneal Analysis System Model I.
    Koch DD; Wakil JS; Samuelson SW; Haft EA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1992 Jul; 18(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 1501084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing the standard operating range of a Placido disk videokeratoscope for corneal surface estimation.
    Alkhaldi W; Iskander DR; Zoubir AM; Collins MJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):800-9. PubMed ID: 19389686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Qazi MA; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15721696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and precision of keratometry, photokeratoscopy, and corneal modeling on calibrated steel balls.
    Hannush SB; Crawford SL; Waring GO; Gemmill MC; Lynn MJ; Nizam A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 107(8):1235-9. PubMed ID: 2757555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The placido wavefront sensor and preliminary measurement on a mechanical eye.
    Carvalho LA; Castro JC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 16501413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical trial of the SUN SK-2000 computer-assisted videokeratoscope.
    Dave TN; Fowler CW; Elawad ME; Dunne MC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Mar; 15(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 7659406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The PAR Technology Corneal Topography System.
    Belin MW; Litoff D; Strods SJ; Winn SS; Smith RS
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 1554645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular lens power calculation after radial keratotomy: estimating the refractive corneal power.
    Awwad ST; Dwarakanathan S; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; Verity SM; Mootha VV; McCulley JP
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17531701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and precision of the corneal analysis system and the topographic modeling system.
    Wilson SE; Verity SM; Conger DL
    Cornea; 1992 Jan; 11(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 1559344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.