These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8241377)

  • 1. Where is the likelihood ratio test powerful for detecting two component normal mixtures?
    Mendell NR; Finch SJ; Thode HC
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 8241377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The likelihood ratio test for the two-component normal mixture problem: power and sample size analysis.
    Mendell NR; Thode HC; Finch SJ
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):1143-8. PubMed ID: 1835889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skewness in commingled distributions.
    Maclean CJ; Morton NE; Elston RC; Yee S
    Biometrics; 1976 Sep; 32(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 963179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
    Gray G
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tests for genetic linkage and homogeneity.
    Lemdani M; Pons O
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1033-41. PubMed ID: 7548688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulated percentage points for the null distribution of the likelihood ratio test for a mixture of two normals.
    Thode HC; Finch SJ; Mendell NR
    Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1195-201. PubMed ID: 3233255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the likelihood ratio test statistic for the number of components in a normal mixture of unequal variances.
    Feng ZD; McCulloch CE
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1158-62. PubMed ID: 7786997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for treatment effect in the presence of regression toward the mean.
    George V; Johnson WD; Shahane A; Nick TG
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 9147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of two-component mixtures of lognormal distributions in grouped, doubly truncated data: analysis of red blood cell volume distributions.
    McLaren CE; Wagstaff M; Brittenham GM; Jacobs A
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):607-22. PubMed ID: 1912264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kurtosis provides a good omnibus test for outliers in small samples.
    Livesey JH
    Clin Biochem; 2007 Sep; 40(13-14):1032-6. PubMed ID: 17499683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a restricted likelihood ratio test for mapping quantitative trait loci with extreme discordant sib pairs.
    Knapp M
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jan; 62(Pt 1):75-87. PubMed ID: 9659980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.
    Putter H; Sandkuijl LA; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 11984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test for equality of intraclass correlation coefficients under unequal family sizes.
    Young DJ; Bhandary M
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1363-73. PubMed ID: 9883539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.