These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8242013)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of two-abutment Hader bar designs.
    Bidez MW; McLoughlin SW; Chen Y; English CE
    Implant Dent; 1993 SUM; 2(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 8242013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element analysis of four-abutment Hader bar designs.
    Bidez MW; Chen Y; McLoughlin SW; English CE
    Implant Dent; 1993; 2(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8142936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis (FEA) studies in 2.5-mm round bar design: the effects of bar length and material composition on bar failure.
    Bidez MW; Chen Y; McLoughlin SW; English CE
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1289549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative stress analyses of fixed free-end osseointegrated prostheses using the finite element method.
    Melo C; Matsushita Y; Koyano K; Hirowatari H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8699521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Force transfer and stress distribution in an implant-supported overdenture retained with a hader bar attachment: a finite element analysis.
    Satheesh Kumar P; Satheesh KK; John J; Patil G; Patel R
    ISRN Dent; 2013 Dec; 2013():369147. PubMed ID: 24459589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
    Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of stresses and forces in selected I-bars using the finite element method.
    Naik PR; Duncanson MG; Mitchell DL; Wiebelt FJ; Johnson DL; Ghosh J
    J Prosthodont; 1997 Mar; 6(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 9497768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided design and transverse strength of screw-retained attachments.
    LaBarre EE; Belser UC; Meyer JM; Watanabe L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 7993543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of occlusal forces on stress distribution in preloaded dental implant screws.
    Alkan I; Sertgöz A; Ekici B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15116032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of transmucosal height in abutments of single and multiple implant-supported prostheses: a non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Borie E; Leal E; Orsi IA; Salamanca C; Dias FJ; Weber B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 29318899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental and computational investigation of Morse taper conometric system reliability for the definition of fixed connections between dental implants and prostheses.
    Bressan E; Lops D; Tomasi C; Ricci S; Stocchero M; Carniel EL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jul; 228(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 25057094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Cross-Section Design and Vertical Misfit on Stress Distribution in Overdenture Retaining System: 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Nogueira MCF; Bacchi A; Mesquita MF; Santos MBF; Consani RLX
    Implant Dent; 2018 Aug; 27(4):445-451. PubMed ID: 29944484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of vertical interarch space and abutment height on stress distributions: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Naveau A; Renault P; Pierrisnard L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 19645311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.