190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8242172)
21. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Utility of Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis Material for Implant Micromovement and Peri-implant Bone Microstrain: A Study in Rabbit Tibia.
Dieguez-Pereira M; Brizuela-Velasco A; Chavarri-Prado D; Perez-Pevida E; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Alvarez-Arenal A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 33270053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
Warren P; Chaffee N; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 12074456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses.
Jacques LB; Moura MS; Suedam V; Souza EA; Rubo JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):737-41. PubMed ID: 19489929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cantilever rests: an alternative to the unsupported distal cantilever of osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses for the edentulous mandible.
McCartney JW
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):817-9. PubMed ID: 1432807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of tilted versus nontilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the restoration of the edentuous mandible: a biomechanical study.
Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Taschieri S; Raimondi MT; Zampelis A; Francetti L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):511-7. PubMed ID: 19587875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone level changes at implants supporting crowns or fixed partial dentures with or without cantilevers.
Hälg GA; Schmid J; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18828813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of implant configurations supporting three-unit fixed partial denture on mandibular bone response: biological-data-based finite element study.
Yoda N; Liao Z; Chen J; Sasaki K; Swain M; Li Q
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 43(9):692-701. PubMed ID: 27224022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of implant number on transverse bending moments during simulated unilateral loading of mandibular fixed-detachable prostheses.
Korioth TW; Chew CB; Chung DH
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9835836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Strains in the implant collars supporting a cantilevered cross-arch bar prosthesis. An in vitro study.
Baaj R; Khalili M; Luke A; Weiner S
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):735-742. PubMed ID: 36648444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A prospective 3-year study of fixed bridges linking Astra Tech ST implants to natural teeth.
Palmer RM; Howe LC; Palmer PJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Jun; 16(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 15877750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Three-Implant-Supported Fixed-Prosthesis Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible: Immediate Versus Delayed Loading.
Primo BT; Mezzari LM; da Fontoura Frasca LC; Linderman R; Rivaldo EG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(3):653–660. PubMed ID: 29543929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Axial loads on implant-supported partial fixed prostheses for external and internal hex connections and machined and plastic copings: strain gauge analysis.
de Vasconcellos LG; Kojima AN; Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LM; Balducci I
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Apr; 41(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 23574373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
