122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8244833)
1. Value of 3-D imaging for staging cervical cancers and predicting behavior.
Maruyama Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Nov; 27(4):981-3. PubMed ID: 8244833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response to editorial by Dr. Maruyama.
Hricak H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Dec; 27(5):1255. PubMed ID: 8110278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging of cervical pathology.
Rezvani M; Shaaban A
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The contribution of new imaging techniques in staging cervical cancer.
Grigsby PW
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S10-2. PubMed ID: 17727940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When and how often should PET scans be performed in the management of cervical cancer?
Lai CH; Yen TC
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Jul; 10(7):983-6. PubMed ID: 20645685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Computerized axial tomography in the staging of cervix uteri carcinoma].
Petrocchi L; Spagnolo R; Winkler S
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1984; 105(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 6732098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Importance of computed tomography for the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of cervix cancer].
Waldmann R; Ziegler F; Schumacher T
Rontgenpraxis; 1986 Jan; 39(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 3952568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
Lemke U; Hamm B
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic and interventional radiology in gynecologic neoplasms.
Thorvinger B
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1992; 378 ( Pt 3)():93-108. PubMed ID: 1323200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cancer of the uterine cervix is the second most frequent gynecologic pathology in the world].
Thille A
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 12807069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Soutter WP; deSouza N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(3):1487; author reply 1488. PubMed ID: 16803557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
Narayan K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 16014109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiology in invasive cervical cancer.
Hricak H; Yu KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1101-8. PubMed ID: 8911159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasonography of cervical lesions].
Schaaps JM
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 12693377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Invasiveness of cancers of the uterine cervix].
Roy C
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12807070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessing the local extent of uterine cervical cancer.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Bando Y; Harada M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Feb; 61(2):267-275. PubMed ID: 31154804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
