BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8245082)

  • 1. Glove perforation during hip arthroplasty. A randomised prospective study of a new taperpoint needle.
    Wright KU; Moran CG; Briggs PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1993 Nov; 75(6):918-20. PubMed ID: 8245082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeon.
    Mingoli A; Sapienza P; Sgarzini G; Luciani G; De Angelis G; Modini C; Ciccarone F; Feldhaus RJ
    Am J Surg; 1996 Nov; 172(5):512-6; discussion 516-7. PubMed ID: 8942555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Needle stick injury. Reducing the risk.
    Rice JJ; McCabe JP; McManus F
    Int Orthop; 1996; 20(3):132-3. PubMed ID: 8832312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff.
    Parantainen A; Verbeek JH; Lavoie MC; Pahwa M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; 2011(11):CD009170. PubMed ID: 22071864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glove perforations with blunt versus sharp surgical needles in caesarean delivery: a randomized trial.
    Stitely ML; Close J; Ferda A; Mehra S; Malson B; Hembree W
    W V Med J; 2013; 109(5):32-6. PubMed ID: 24294709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of blunt needles does not reduce glove perforations during obstetrical laceration repair.
    Wilson LK; Sullivan S; Goodnight W; Chang EY; Soper D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):641.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18639205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.
    Chan KY; Singh VA; Oun BH; To BH
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Dec; 61 Suppl B():3-7. PubMed ID: 17605178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of blunt suture needle in episiotomy repair at uncomplicated vaginal deliveries in reducing glove perforation rate: a randomized controlled trial.
    El-Refaie TA; Sayed KK; El-Shourbagy MA; Arafat EA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 May; 38(5):787-92. PubMed ID: 22414094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations.
    Rogers B; Goodno L
    Am J Prev Med; 2000 May; 18(4 Suppl):90-8. PubMed ID: 10793285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a "no-touch" technique to reduce the incidence of glove perforation during suture needle adjustment.
    Orengo I; Pielop J; Ransdell BL
    Dermatol Surg; 2003 Dec; 29(12):1215-6. PubMed ID: 14725665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are we getting the point? Needlestick injuries-an ongoing problem.
    McAdam TK; McLaughlin RE; McNicholl B
    Int J STD AIDS; 2002 Jul; 13(7):453-5. PubMed ID: 12171663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized trial of blunt-tipped versus cutting needles to reduce glove puncture during mass closure of the abdomen.
    Hartley JE; Ahmed S; Milkins R; Naylor G; Monson JR; Lee PW
    Br J Surg; 1996 Aug; 83(8):1156-7. PubMed ID: 8869333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing accidental injuries during surgery.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Hill LG; Thacker JG; McGregor W
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12825744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized clinical trial comparing blunt tapered and standard needles in closing abdominal fascia.
    Nordkam RA; Bluyssen SJ; van Goor H
    World J Surg; 2005 Apr; 29(4):441-5; discussion 445. PubMed ID: 15776298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical glove bacterial contamination and perforation during total hip arthroplasty implantation: when gloves should be changed.
    Beldame J; Lagrave B; Lievain L; Lefebvre B; Frebourg N; Dujardin F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 98(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 22578871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The risk of needle-stick-injuries during abdominal closure].
    Meyer D; Geiger D; Hamelmann W; Timmermann W; Thiede A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 8852738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased awareness of glove perforation in major joint replacement. A prospective, randomised study of Regent Biogel Reveal gloves.
    Nicolai P; Aldam CH; Allen PW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 May; 79(3):371-3. PubMed ID: 9180311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Al-Maiyah M; Bajwa A; Mackenney P; Port A; Gregg PJ; Hill D; Finn P
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Apr; 87(4):556-9. PubMed ID: 15795210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An enzyme-mediated assay to quantify inoculation volume delivered by suture needlestick injury: two gloves are better than one.
    Lefebvre DR; Strande LF; Hewitt CW
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 18155576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glove failure: an occupational hazard of surgeons in a developing country.
    Gunasekera PC; Fernando RJ; de Silva KK
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1997 Apr; 42(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 9114678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.