These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8245808)

  • 1. Office systems for promoting screening mammography. A survey of primary care practices.
    Melville SK; Luckmann R; Coghlin J; Gann P
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Dec; 37(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 8245808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
    Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
    Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing compliance with mammography recommendations: health assessment forms.
    Yarnall KS; Michener JL; Broadhead WE; Tse CK
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Jan; 36(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 8419505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.
    Mohler PJ
    Fam Med; 1995 Feb; 27(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7737444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.
    Reeves MJ; Remington PL
    Prev Med; 1999 Sep; 29(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 10479608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organizational systems used by California capitated medical groups and independent practice associations to increase cancer screening.
    Malin JL; Kahn K; Dulai G; Farmer MM; Rideout J; Simon LP; Ganz PA
    Cancer; 2000 Jun; 88(12):2824-31. PubMed ID: 10870067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
    Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older.
    Michielutte R; Sharp PC; Foley KL; Cunningham LE; Spangler JG; Paskett ED; Case LD
    Health Educ Res; 2005 Apr; 20(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 15254001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer.
    Mandelblatt J; Kanetsky PA
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Feb; 40(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 7654272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cancer prevention practices and continuing education needs of primary care physicians.
    Costanza ME; Hoople NE; Gaw VP; Stoddard AM
    Am J Prev Med; 1993; 9(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 8471267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan.
    Davis NA; Nash E; Bailey C; Lewis MJ; Rimer BK; Koplan JP
    Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 9236968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; McQuillen D; Martin D; Maraj M
    Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 10564629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complete diagnostic evaluation in colorectal cancer screening: research design and baseline findings.
    Myers RE; Turner B; Weinberg D; Hauck WW; Hyslop T; Brigham T; Rothermel T; Grana J; Schlackman N
    Prev Med; 2001 Oct; 33(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 11570828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics of primary care office systems as predictors of mammography utilization.
    Gann P; Melville SK; Luckmann R
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Jun; 118(11):893-8. PubMed ID: 8480964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
    dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary.
    Cherry DK; Burt CW; Woodwell DA
    Adv Data; 2003 Aug; (337):1-44. PubMed ID: 12924075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.