These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8245996)

  • 1. Comparison of the subvastus and paramedian surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty.
    Fauré BT; Benjamin JB; Lindsey B; Volz RG; Schutte D
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Oct; 8(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 8245996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty.
    Cila E; Güzel V; Ozalay M; Tan J; Simşek SA; Kanatli U; Oztürk A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Mar; 122(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 11880904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial.
    Roysam GS; Oakley MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jun; 16(4):454-7. PubMed ID: 11402407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the modified subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty.
    Jung YB; Lee YS; Lee EY; Jung HJ; Nam CH
    Int Orthop; 2009 Apr; 33(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 18196241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength and voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris muscle in total knee arthroplasty with midvastus and subvastus approaches.
    Berth A; Urbach D; Neumann W; Awiszus F
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17197313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches.
    White RE; Allman JK; Trauger JA; Dales BH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):117-22. PubMed ID: 10546605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isokinetic strength testing of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty recovery.
    Schroer WC; Diesfeld PJ; Reedy ME; LeMarr AR
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 19062250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty.
    Parentis MA; Rumi MN; Deol GS; Kothari M; Parrish WM; Pellegrini VD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):107-16. PubMed ID: 10546604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
    Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of subvastus and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
    Bonutti PM; Zywiel MG; Ulrich SD; Stroh DA; Seyler TM; Mont MA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):575-82. PubMed ID: 20194315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.
    Montgomery WH; Insall JN; Haas SB; Becker MS; Windsor RE
    Am J Knee Surg; 1998; 11(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 9533049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty].
    Shi MG; Lü HS; Guan ZP
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(16):1101-5. PubMed ID: 17081464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of the quadriceps snip.
    Garvin KL; Scuderi G; Insall JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Dec; (321):131-7. PubMed ID: 7497658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty.
    Aglietti P; Baldini A; Sensi L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Nov; 452():106-11. PubMed ID: 16957651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in TKA: comparison of functional results.
    Dutka J; Skowronek M; Sosin P; Skowronek P
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jun; 34(6):148. PubMed ID: 21667899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of the mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty technique: an analysis of 725 cases with mean 2-year follow-up.
    Schroer WC; Diesfeld PJ; LeMarr A; Reedy ME
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2007; 16(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 17963656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].
    Gacon G; Coillard JY; Barba L; Travers V
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Restricted motion after total knee arthroplasty].
    Kucera T; Urban K; Karpas K; Sponer P
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Oct; 74(5):326-31. PubMed ID: 18001629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total knee arthroplasty performed with either a mini-subvastus or a standard approach: a prospective randomized controlled study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
    Lai Z; Shi S; Fei J; Wei W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(8):1155-62. PubMed ID: 24595613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty.
    McAllister CM; Stepanian JD
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 18165022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.