These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8245999)

  • 1. Increased varus-valgus tilting of screw-fixated knee prostheses. Stereoradiographic study of uncemented versus cemented tibial components.
    Nilsson KG; Kärrholm J
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Oct; 8(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 8245999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral component migration in total knee arthroplasty: randomized study comparing cemented and uncemented fixation of the Miller-Galante I design.
    Nilsson KG; Kärrholm J; Linder L
    J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 7602396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of micromotion in cemented vs uncemented knee arthroplasty in osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Randomized study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
    Nilsson KG; Kärrholm J; Ekelund L; Magnusson P
    J Arthroplasty; 1991 Sep; 6(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 1940933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].
    Gacon G; Coillard JY; Barba L; Travers V
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of the preoperative bone quality on the fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
    Li MG; Nilsson KG
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Sep; 15(6):744-53. PubMed ID: 11021450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.
    Carlsson A; Björkman A; Besjakov J; Onsten I
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 16156464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subsidence of tibial components in knee arthroplasty. A comparison between conventional radiography and roentgen stereophotogrammetry.
    Ryd L; Egund N
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Jul; 30(7):396-400. PubMed ID: 7591648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis.
    Henricson A; Linder L; Nilsson KG
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1585-93. PubMed ID: 19043129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles.
    Thanner J
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Aug; 286():1-41. PubMed ID: 10572504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncemented HA-coated implant is the optimum fixation for TKA in the young patient.
    Nilsson KG; Henricson A; Norgren B; Dalén T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jul; 448():129-39. PubMed ID: 16826107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Micromotion in knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation.
    Ryd L
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1986; 220():1-80. PubMed ID: 3461667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Micromotion of a noncemented tibial component with screw fixation. An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of the Miller-Galante prosthesis.
    Ryd L; Carlsson L; Herberts P
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Oct; (295):218-25. PubMed ID: 8403652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cementless reconstruction of massive tibial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Whiteside LA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Nov; (248):80-6. PubMed ID: 2805500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total knee arthroplasty using an uncemented, polyethylene tibial implant. A seven-year follow-up study.
    Laskin RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Mar; (288):270-6. PubMed ID: 8458144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Hybrid" total knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante prosthesis. A prospective clinical and roentgenographic evaluation.
    Kraay MJ; Meyers SA; Goldberg VM; Figgie HE; Conroy PA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):32-41. PubMed ID: 1959284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinematics of successful knee prostheses during weight-bearing: three-dimensional movements and positions of screw axes in the Tricon-M and Miller-Galante designs.
    Kärrholm J; Jonsson H; Nilsson KG; Söderqvist I
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1994; 2(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 7584178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximally cemented versus uncemented Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study.
    Albrektsson BE; Carlsson LV; Freeman MA; Herberts P; Ryd L
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 Mar; 74(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 1544959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty.
    Albrektsson BE; Ryd L; Carlsson LV; Freeman MA; Herberts P; Regnér L; Selvik G
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1990 Mar; 72(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2312565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory arthritis and compromised bone.
    Stuchin SA; Ruoff M; Matarese W
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):42-51. PubMed ID: 1959285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components.
    Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Ikebuchi M; Inori F; Takaoka K
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):700-6. PubMed ID: 20194329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.