BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8246001)

  • 1. Functional osseointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in a weight-bearing canine model.
    Maistrelli GL; Mahomed N; Fornasier V; Antonelli L; Li Y; Binnington A
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Oct; 8(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 8246001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
    Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted titanium hip stems: a canine study.
    Eckardt A; Aberman HM; Cantwell HD; Heine J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Feb; 123(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12582793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical and histological fixation of hydroxylapatite-coated pyrolytic carbon and titanium alloy implants: a report of short-term results.
    Hetherington VJ; Lord CE; Brown SA
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 8589509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for orthopedic implant applications.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):225-43. PubMed ID: 2838208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ability of zirconia double coated with titanium and hydroxyapatite to bond to bone under load-bearing conditions.
    Suzuki T; Fujibayashi S; Nakagawa Y; Noda I; Nakamura T
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):996-1002. PubMed ID: 16115676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydroxyapatite porous coating and the osteointegration of the total hip replacement.
    Landor I; Vavrik P; Sosna A; Jahoda D; Hahn H; Daniel M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Feb; 127(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 17013602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of hydroxyapatite-coated and alumina-coated metal implants.
    Inadome T; Hayashi K; Nakashima Y; Tsumura H; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7713954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions.
    Søballe K; Hansen ES; B-Rasmussen H; Jørgensen PH; Bünger C
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Mar; 10(2):285-99. PubMed ID: 1311039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nano-mechanics of bone and bioactive bone cement interfaces in a load-bearing model.
    Ni GX; Choy YS; Lu WW; Ngan AH; Chiu KY; Li ZY; Tang B; Luk KD
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(9):1963-70. PubMed ID: 16226309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histological and mechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated cobalt-chrome and titanium implants in the rabbit femur.
    Friedman RJ; Bauer TW; Garg K; Jiang M; An YH; Draughn RA
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 8589507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants.
    Cook SD; Baffes GC; Palafox AJ; Wolfe MW; Burgess A
    J Oral Implantol; 1992; 18(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 1298818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical failure of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy implants. An animal study.
    Nimb L; Gotfredsen K; Steen Jensen J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 8116363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone bonding to hydroxyapatite and titanium surfaces on femoral stems retrieved from human subjects at autopsy.
    Porter AE; Taak P; Hobbs LW; Coathup MJ; Blunn GW; Spector M
    Biomaterials; 2004 Sep; 25(21):5199-208. PubMed ID: 15109844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental coating defects in hydroxylapatite-coated implants.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Apr; (265):280-90. PubMed ID: 1849063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The response of cancellous and cortical canine bone to hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated titanium rods.
    Rashmir-Raven AM; Richardson DC; Aberman HM; DeYoung DJ
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 8589508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Ca/P coating resorption and surgical fit on the bone/implant interface.
    Maxian SH; Zawadsky JP; Dunn MG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Nov; 28(11):1311-9. PubMed ID: 7829561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of solid hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Hayashi K; Inadome T; Mashima T; Sugioka Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 8314808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium for use as an orthopedic biologic attachment system.
    Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF; Jarcho M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 May; (230):303-12. PubMed ID: 2835198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and hyaluronic acid on the osseointegration of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: an experimental study in sheep.
    Aebli N; Stich H; Schawalder P; Theis JC; Krebs J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Jun; 73(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 15834931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.