98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 824659)
1. NIH peer review favoritism: lavish financial support for questionable old concept of mammalian melanogenesis; absence of support for work based on new concept.
Okun MR; Edelstein LM; Patel RP
Physiol Chem Phys; 1976; 8(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 824659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A revised concept of mammalian melanogenesis: the possible synergistic functions of aerobic dopa oxidase and peroxidase. A review.
Okun MR; Edelstein LM; Patel RP; Donnellan B
Yale J Biol Med; 1973 Dec; 46(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 4205120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro effects of hormonal stimuli upon tyrosinase and peroxidase activities in murine melanomas.
Abramowitz J; Chavin W
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 1978 Dec; 85(3):1067-73. PubMed ID: 216361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Tyrosinase and dopa oxidase in amelanotic melanoma in man].
Chicewicz M; Roczniak E
Wiad Lek; 1977 Aug; 30(15):1187-91. PubMed ID: 410164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-hormonal regulation of tyrosinase expression in B16/C3 melanoma cells in culture.
Smith TJ; Kline EL
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1988; 262():241-55. PubMed ID: 3131777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The effect of dinitrophenylation on the tyrosinase activity of extracts from human melanomas].
Schwartze G
Dermatol Monatsschr; 1986; 172(8):498-500. PubMed ID: 3095156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH.
Bucy PC
Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. NIH and the scientist--and a crisis of apathy.
Waitzman MB
Fed Proc; 1974 Jun; 33(6):1677-8. PubMed ID: 4827512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stimulation of tyrosinase by dihydroxy phenyl derivatives.
Karg E; Rosengren E; Rorsman H
Acta Derm Venereol; 1989; 69(6):521-4. PubMed ID: 2575328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent changes in NIH peer review system.
Demsey A
Physiologist; 1988 Dec; 31(6):155-6. PubMed ID: 3237781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review of research project grants by NIH study sections: report of the Committee on National Medical Policy, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Bondurant S
Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 10304718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH peer review system: facts and figures on study sections add up to trouble.
Fed Proc; 1978 Aug; 37(10):1a-4a. PubMed ID: 581073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter: Peer review system utilized by the NIH and the NSF.
Fed Proc; 1973 Dec; 32(12):2142-3. PubMed ID: 4753768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. NSF probes peer review; NIH investigates awards.
Change; 1976 Feb; 8(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 1030336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of peroxidase in mammalian melanogenesis: a review.
Okun MR
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR; 1996; 28(2):91-100; discussion 100-1. PubMed ID: 8946768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The peer review process: how to prepare research grant applications to the NIH.
Novello AC
Miner Electrolyte Metab; 1985; 11(5):281-6. PubMed ID: 4047004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The histochemical detection of peroxidase in phenoloxidase containing human blood cells (POZ)].
Schmidt H
Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch; 1981; 108(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 6164618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes.
Henley C
Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying?
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
