154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8248493)
1. Nurses fail to listen to patient's complaints. Case in point: Harmon v. Patel 617 N.E. 2d 183--IL (1993).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Oct; 34(5):2. PubMed ID: 8248493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Does "monitor the patients" mean constantly?: $1.5 million verdict. Case in point: Adams v. Cooper Hospital 684 A. 2d 506--NJ (1996).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1997 Jan; 37(8):2. PubMed ID: 9070774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurses fail to keep physicians informed of multiple seizures. Case in point: Glassman v. St. Joseph Hospital 631 N.E. 2d 1186--IL (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):4. PubMed ID: 8047646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. IL: surgeon 'drops scissors' in nurse's hand: glove punctured--suit brought by nurse.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jun; 43(1):3. PubMed ID: 12154445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal case briefs for nurses. LA: abscess results in spinal meningitis: kudos for home health care nurse. IL: jury awards accident victim $7 million: no Res Ipsa Loquitur liability.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Apr; 35(11):3. PubMed ID: 7746866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Polygraph tests for nurses ordered. Case in point: Marsh v. Lake Forest Hospital (519 N.E. 2d 504 (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):2. PubMed ID: 3368575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wrong meds & death on "life flight": jurisdictional issues. Case in point: Cowart v. Shelby County. Health Care Corp. 911F. Supp. 248--MS (1996).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):4. PubMed ID: 8711112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Nurses failed to 'advocate' for their patient. Case on point: Rowe v. Sisters of Pallottine Missionary Society, 2001 WL 1585453 s.e.2d -WV.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Jan; 42(8):2. PubMed ID: 15301071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can nurses be compelled to testify against co-workers? Case in point: Cenkovich v. Almeida 634 N.E. 2d 30--IL (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Aug; 35(3):4. PubMed ID: 7938495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. RNs fail to notify Dr. of changes: proximate cause issues.
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 May; 34(12):1. PubMed ID: 8016315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgeon not liable for CRNA: no "borrowed servant". Case in point: Harris V. Miller 438 S. E. 2d 731 NC (1994).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Mar; 34(10):2. PubMed ID: 8184088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can doctors rely on nurses' sponge counts? Case in point: Van Hook v. Anderson (824 P. 2d 509--WA (1992)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):2. PubMed ID: 1603936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
