393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8249505)
1. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
Partoll LM; Javaheri G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphometric analysis of dysplasia in cervical cone biopsy specimens in cases with false-negative cytology.
Hartman B; Kaplan B; Boone D
Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Dec; 68(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 3785796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].
Kerl J; Ross A; Hilgarth M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 2026300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of an endocervical brush in obtaining adequate Papanicolaou smears.
Grossman MB; Clofine R
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1991 Sep; 91(9):875-9. PubMed ID: 1757278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears.
Shen JT; Nalick RH; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
Acta Cytol; 1984; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
