These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8249505)

  • 21. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
    Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A randomized trial comparing two methods of cold knife conization with laser conization.
    Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Hølund B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1009-13. PubMed ID: 2234708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The contribution of endocervical smears to cervical cancer detection.
    Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM; Littleton HJ; Straugin JM
    Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 1096515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
    Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distinguishing tubal metaplasia from endocervical dysplasia on cervical Papanicolaou smears.
    Van Le L; Novotny D; Dotters DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 2):974-6. PubMed ID: 1923244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endometrial and endocervical curettage findings at the time of cervical conization.
    Presley JJ; Hernandez E; Mudafort E; Miyazawa K
    J Reprod Med; 1987 Feb; 32(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 3560085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. RO-TAGE biopsy. An improved method of endocervical evaluation.
    Mann WJ; Chumas J; Rochelson B; Funt M; Westermann C
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 4009558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
    Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.