These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8249524)

  • 1. Statistics and cervical sampling methods.
    Boon ME; de Graaf Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ; Hermans J
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):980. PubMed ID: 8249524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenge of quality improvement with the Papanicolaou smear.
    Kline TS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 9111111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting high-risk human papillomavirus in liquid-based cytology specimens.
    Qureshi MN
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):582. PubMed ID: 16334042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cervical smears and evaluation of quality].
    Marsan C
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 9004721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
    Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
    Weintraub D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cancer screening in Canadian Native women. Adequacy of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Hislop TG; Band PR; Deschamps M; Clarke HF; Smith JM; Ng VT
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8291352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
    DeMay RM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cervical smears unsuitable for exclusion of cervical carcinoma].
    Giard RW; Blok P
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 10674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cytology screening and evaluation.
    Noller KL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 106(2):391-7. PubMed ID: 16055593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New cervical cancer screening guidelines.
    Health News; 2003 Jan; 9(1):9. PubMed ID: 12545955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Those gland problems in cervical cytology: faith or fact? Observations from the Bethesda 2001 terminology conference.
    Moriarty AT; Wilbur D
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 12672090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of suboptimal cytologic smears: persistent inflammatory smears.
    Vassilakos P
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(6):1481. PubMed ID: 9850666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
    Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Good rules for cervical cytologic sampling].
    Broso PR; Garrone C
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Oct; 49(10):455-62. PubMed ID: 9463179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
    van Rijswijk A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative cytologic yield and quality of three Pap smear instruments.
    Toffler WL; Pluedeman CK; Sinclair AE; Ireland KM; Byrne BJ
    Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8349063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.