These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8249802)
21. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. Kilner PJ; Manzara CC; Mohiaddin RH; Pennell DJ; Sutton MG; Firmin DN; Underwood SR; Longmore DB Circulation; 1993 Apr; 87(4):1239-48. PubMed ID: 8462150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complex flow patterns in the great vessels: a review. Bogren HG; Buonocore MH Int J Card Imaging; 1999 Apr; 15(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 10453409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of flow measurements by magnetic resonance velocity mapping to congenital heart disease. Rees S; Firmin D; Mohiaddin R; Underwood R; Longmore D Am J Cardiol; 1989 Oct; 64(14):953-6. PubMed ID: 2801569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Flow quantification in coronary and bypass vessels with MR phase contrast technique]. Kreitner KF; Voigtländer T; Wittlinger T; Dahm M; Kalden P; Meyer J; Thelen M Radiologe; 2000 Feb; 40(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 10758628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison between biventricular cine MRI and MR flow quantification in ascending aorta and pulmonary outflow tract for the assessment of intracardial shunt volumes]. Rominger MB; Kluge A; Dinkel HP; Bachmann GF Rofo; 2002 Nov; 174(11):1380-6. PubMed ID: 12424664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Arterial switch procedure for D-transposition of the great arteries: quantitative midterm evaluation of hemodynamic changes with cine MR imaging and phase-shift velocity mapping-initial experience. Gutberlet M; Boeckel T; Hosten N; Vogel M; Kühne T; Oellinger H; Ehrenstein T; Venz S; Hetzer R; Bein G; Felix R Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):467-75. PubMed ID: 10671595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Functional evaluation of the heart with magnetic resonance imaging. Higgins CB; Holt W; Pflugfelder P; Sechtem U Magn Reson Med; 1988 Feb; 6(2):121-39. PubMed ID: 3367771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Biventricular MR volumetric analysis and MR flow quantification in the ascending aorta and pulmonary trunk for quantification of valvular regurgitation]. Rominger MB; Kluge A; Bachmann GF Rofo; 2004 Mar; 176(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 15026947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation. Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantification of coronary artery volume flow rate using fast velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. Sakuma H; Saeed M; Takeda K; Wendland MF; Schwitter J; Szolar DH; Derugin N; Shimakawa A; Foo TK; Higgins CB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1363-7. PubMed ID: 9129446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The application of breath hold phase velocity mapping techniques to the measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity: phantom data and initial in vivo results. Keegan J; Firmin D; Gatehouse P; Longmore D Magn Reson Med; 1994 May; 31(5):526-36. PubMed ID: 8015406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An in vivo validation of quantitative blood flow imaging in arteries and veins using magnetic resonance phase-shift techniques. Van Rossum AC; Sprenger M; Visser FC; Peels KH; Valk J; Roos JP Eur Heart J; 1991 Feb; 12(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2044544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new Doppler method for quantification of volumetric flow: in vivo validation using color Doppler. Kim WY; Poulsen JK; Terp K; Staalsen NH J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):182-92. PubMed ID: 8522693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flow-sensitive four-dimensional cine magnetic resonance imaging for offline blood flow quantification in multiple vessels: a validation study. Nordmeyer S; Riesenkampff E; Crelier G; Khasheei A; Schnackenburg B; Berger F; Kuehne T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 32(3):677-83. PubMed ID: 20815066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of coronary blood flow in humans using phase difference MR imaging. Comparison with intracoronary Doppler flow measurement. Kessler W; Moshage W; Galland A; Zink D; Achenbach S; Nitz W; Laub G; Bachmann K Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Jun; 14(3):179-86; discussion 187-9. PubMed ID: 9813755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Coronary artery flow measurement using navigator echo gated phase contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping at 3.0 T. Johnson K; Sharma P; Oshinski J J Biomech; 2008; 41(3):595-602. PubMed ID: 18036532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow. Sun Y; Hearshen DO; Rankin GW; Haggar AM J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 1633398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of Spatial Resolution in Three-dimensional Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis. Fukuyama A; Isoda H; Morita K; Mori M; Watanabe T; Ishiguro K; Komori Y; Kosugi T Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):311-316. PubMed ID: 28132996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Gabbour M; Schnell S; Jarvis K; Robinson JD; Markl M; Rigsby CK Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 25487721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of coronary flow reserve using fast velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: validation study using positron emission tomography. Sakuma H; Koskenvuo JW; Niemi P; Kawada N; Toikka JO; Knuuti J; Laine H; Saraste M; Kormano M; Hartiala JJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1029-33. PubMed ID: 11000158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]