These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8250069)

  • 1. An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field.
    Mandava S; Zulauf M; Zeyen T; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Dec; 116(6):684-91. PubMed ID: 8250069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
    Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP).
    Johnson CA; Sample PA; Cioffi GA; Liebmann JR; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 12140023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma.
    Boeglin RJ; Caprioli J; Zulauf M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1992 Apr; 113(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 1558113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of early glaucomatous progression with octopus cluster trend analysis.
    Naghizadeh F; Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2014; 23(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 24892507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability.
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Aug; 101(8):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7741836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
    Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffuse glaucomatous structural and functional damage in the hemifield without significant pattern loss.
    Grewal DS; Sehi M; Greenfield DS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov; 127(11):1442-8. PubMed ID: 19901209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence and spatial concordance of visual field deterioration in fellow eyes of glaucoma patients.
    Kim MK; Lee JM; Morales E; Caprioli J
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 25435745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of logistic discriminant analysis for interpreting initial visual field defects.
    Antón A; Maquet JA; Mayo A; Tapia J; Pastor JC
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Mar; 104(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 9082284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluctuation of the differential light threshold at the border of absolute scotomas. Comparison between glaucomatous visual field defects and blind spots.
    Haefliger IO; Flammer J
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Oct; 98(10):1529-32. PubMed ID: 1961639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study.
    Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Coleman AL; Liu G; Li G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J;
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1627-35. PubMed ID: 15350314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
    Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study.
    Caprioli J; Coleman AL
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Jul; 115(7):1123-1129.e3. PubMed ID: 18082889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices.
    Asman P; Heijl A; Olsson J; Rootzén H
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Oct; 70(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 1471495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence, Features, and Severity of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Measured With the 10-2 Achromatic Threshold Visual Field Test.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Karin Tran MT; Pensyl D; Tsan G; Katiyar S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 168():40-51. PubMed ID: 27173372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How often do patients need visual field tests?
    Viswanathan AC; Hitchings RA; Fitzke FW
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1997 Sep; 235(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 9342606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.