These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8250774)

  • 1. Diagnosis related groups: the effect of input error.
    Westphalen JB
    Aust Clin Rev; 1993; 13(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8250774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Casemix funding in psychiatry: some problems and common pitfalls.
    Hay PJ; Pearce T
    Aust Health Rev; 1996; 19(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 10159215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Casemix funding for acute hospital inpatient services in Australia.
    Duckett SJ
    Med J Aust; 1998 Oct; 169(S1):S17-21. PubMed ID: 9830405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a public hospital funding model to strengthen a case for improved nutritional care in a cancer setting.
    Boltong AG; Loeliger JM; Steer BL
    Aust Health Rev; 2013 Jun; 37(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 23731960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Major trauma: the unseen financial burden to trauma centres, a descriptive multicentre analysis.
    Curtis K; Lam M; Mitchell R; Dickson C; McDonnell K
    Aust Health Rev; 2014 Feb; 38(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 24240704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential loss of revenue due to errors in clinical coding during the implementation of the Malaysia diagnosis related group (MY-DRG
    Zafirah SA; Nur AM; Puteh SEW; Aljunid SM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jan; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 29370785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The practical application of DRG and casemix information in planning and funding models.
    Henderson N
    Aust Health Rev; 1991; 14(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 10117336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The risk and consequences of clinical miscoding due to inadequate medical documentation: a case study of the impact on health services funding.
    Cheng P; Gilchrist A; Robinson KM; Paul L
    Health Inf Manag; 2009; 38(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19293434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality of medical database to valorize the DRG model by ISA cost indicators].
    Holstein J; Taright N; Lepage E; Razafimamonjy J; Duboc D; Feldman L; Hittinger L; Lavergne T; Chatellier G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Dec; 50(6):593-603. PubMed ID: 12515929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Casemix: the building blocks.
    Jackson T
    Aust Health Rev; 1995; 18(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 10141957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating DRG cost weights for hospitals in middle income countries.
    Ghaffari S; Doran C; Wilson A; Aisbett C; Jackson T
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2009; 24(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 18536005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Casemix funding of hospitals: objectives and objections.
    Palmer G
    Health Care Anal; 1996 Aug; 4(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 10162141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Casemix funding of hospitals: ethical objections.
    Ramsay M
    Health Care Anal; 1996 Aug; 4(3):194-6. PubMed ID: 10162142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Casemix-based funding of Northern Territory public hospitals: adjusting for severity and socio-economic variations.
    Beaver C; Zhao Y; McDermid S; Hindle D
    Health Econ; 1998 Feb; 7(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9541084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physician and coding errors in patient records.
    Lloyd SS; Rissing JP
    JAMA; 1985 Sep; 254(10):1330-6. PubMed ID: 3927014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of hospital data and DRGs.
    Aas IH
    Scand J Soc Med; 1988; 16(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 3148192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suitability of casemix classification for output funding of blood services in Victoria. Victorian Blood Users Group.
    Whyte GS; Brook CW
    Med J Aust; 1998 Oct; 169(8):415-8. PubMed ID: 9830388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis-related groups: physician and abstractor reliability and financial significance of errors.
    Bindman AB; Eichenfield LF; Geller SA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984 Jun; 51(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 6431272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of flat-rate payment in radiation oncology. German experience with disease-related groups for inpatient funding in radiation oncology].
    Glocker S; Loskamp N; Bamberg M; Roeder N
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jun; 182(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 16703284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample.
    Berthelsen CL
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):10-23. PubMed ID: 11143275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.