75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8252479)
1. Breast cancer screening in an urban public hospital. Five-year results.
Bressler J; Ansell D; Parker J; Dillard J; Whitman S
Cancer; 1993 Dec; 72(12):3636-40. PubMed ID: 8252479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer screening in an urban black population. A preliminary report.
Ansell DA; Dillard J; Rothenberg M; Bork J; Fizzotti GF; Alagaratnam D; Shiomoto G; Gunther T; Greager JA
Cancer; 1988 Jul; 62(2):425-8. PubMed ID: 3383141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program: foundations and design of a model for reaching older, minority, rural women.
Earp JA; Altpeter M; Mayne L; Viadro CI; O'Malley MS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1995 Jul; 35(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 7612907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. European transnational ecological deprivation index and participation in population-based breast cancer screening programmes in France.
Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Roussot A; Pornet C; Sarlin N; Lunaud P; Desmidt P; Quantin C; Chauvin F; Dancourt V; Arveux P
Prev Med; 2014 Jun; 63():103-8. PubMed ID: 24345603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer in a county hospital population: impact of breast screening on stage of presentation.
Leitch AM; Garvey RF
Ann Surg Oncol; 1994 Nov; 1(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 7850558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.
Peer PG; Holland R; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M; Verbeek AL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 8120918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in breast cancer screening in Missouri from 1987 to 1995, and predictions for the years 2000 and 2010.
Sarr M; Simoes EJ; Murayi T; Figgs LT; Brownson RC
Mo Med; 1998 Dec; 95(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 9863343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Incidence of breast cancer before and after implementation of mammography screening].
Hofvind S; Sørum R; Haldorsen T; Langmark F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(22):2935-8. PubMed ID: 17117191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.
McElroy JA; Remington PL; Gangnon RE; Hariharan L; Andersen LD
Prev Chronic Dis; 2006 Jan; 3(1):A10. PubMed ID: 16356363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of mammography facility locations and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in Chicago.
Tarlov E; Zenk SN; Campbell RT; Warnecke RB; Block R
J Urban Health; 2009 Mar; 86(2):196-213. PubMed ID: 18972211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Robson B; Gregory M; Craig K
Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(6):828-839. PubMed ID: 28183141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing mammography utilization: a controlled study.
Fletcher SW; Harris RP; Gonzalez JJ; Degnan D; Lannin DR; Strecher VJ; Pilgrim C; Quade D; Earp JA; Clark RL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jan; 85(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 8418300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
