These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8252676)
1. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location. Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems. Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation. Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endocardial pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation using a braided endocardial lead system. Saksena S; Luceri R; Krol RB; Brownstein S; Burkhardt E; Accorti P; Brewer G; Scott S; Callaghan F; Livingston A Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 71(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8456763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads. Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system. Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode. Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system. Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation. Swartz JF; Fletcher RD; Karasik PE Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2646-54. PubMed ID: 8252675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation. Neri R; Palermo P; Cesario AS; Baragli D; Amici E; Laudadio MT; De Rosa A; DeSeta F; Mongeon L; Gambelli G J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 10387142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds. Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system. Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of simultaneous versus sequential defibrillation pulsing techniques using a nonthoracotomy system. Hsia HH; Kleiman RB; Flores BT; Marchlinski FE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 17(7):1222-30. PubMed ID: 7937228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation. Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Dahl RW; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 3(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10490479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants. Keane D; Aweh N; Hynes B; Sheahan RG; Cripps T; Bashir Y; Zaidi A; Fahy G; Lowe M; Doherty P; Kroll MK Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy. Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation. Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]