These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8253238)

  • 1. Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 4)():554-61. PubMed ID: 8253238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clustering of fixation targets in multifixation campimetry.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Tavadia SM
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():131-3. PubMed ID: 8325402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eccentric fixation in Stargardt's disease assessed by Tübingen perimetry.
    Messias A; Reinhard J; Velasco e Cruz AA; Dietz K; MacKeben M; Trauzettel-Klosinski S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5815-22. PubMed ID: 18055836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Topographical reproducibility of small scotoma using computerised dynamic fixation target.
    Mutlukan E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995-1996; 91(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 8886586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [CAU--an accessory device for automatic monitoring and evaluation of fixation with the computer perimeter Competer].
    Menapace R; Trauner H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Oct; 187(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 4068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perimetry while moving the eyes: implications for the variability of visual field defects.
    Toepfer A; Kasten E; Guenther T; Sabel BA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 28(4):308-19. PubMed ID: 19145132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
    Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
    Asman P; Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The detection of paracentral scotomas with varying grids in computed perimetry.
    King D; Drance SM; Douglas GR; Wijsman K
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):524-5. PubMed ID: 3754131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual field interpretation with a personal computer based neural network.
    Mutlukan E; Keating D
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 3)():321-3. PubMed ID: 7958038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do computerised visual fields and automated optic disc analysis assist in the choice of therapy in glaucoma?
    Mikelberg FS
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 1)():47-9. PubMed ID: 1426399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration of the Dicon Auto Perimeter 2000 compared with that of the Goldmann perimeter.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 96(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 6660263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experiences with a new attachment for automatic monitoring and evaluation of fixation with the Competer computer perimeter].
    Menapace R; Trauner H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Nov; 187(5):348-50. PubMed ID: 4087782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in a pediatric population.
    Becker K; Semes L
    Optometry; 2003 Mar; 74(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 12645850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.