These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8255562)

  • 1. Increasing the uptake of cervical smears: strategies implemented among general practitioners in Auckland.
    White GE; McAvoy BR; Gleisner S
    N Z Med J; 1993 Aug; 106(962):357-60. PubMed ID: 8255562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
    Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for cervical cancer: attitudes and policies among Auckland general practitioners.
    McMaster H; Arroll B
    N Z Med J; 1992 Apr; 105(931):125-7. PubMed ID: 1560922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
    Ridsdale LL
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical screening: what do Auckland general practitioners do?
    McMaster H; Arroll B; Towers S; McAvoy B
    N Z Med J; 1992 Oct; 105(944):425-7. PubMed ID: 1297938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cytology screening. How can we improve rates among First Nations women in urban British Columbia?
    Hislop TG; Clarke HF; Deschamps M; Joseph R; Band PR; Smith J; Le N; Atleo R
    Can Fam Physician; 1996 Sep; 42():1701-8. PubMed ID: 8828873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health screening in a general practice by opportunistic recruitment.
    McMenamin JP
    N Z Med J; 1992 Dec; 105(947):495-7. PubMed ID: 1461608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening.
    Naish J; Brown J; Denton B
    BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6962):1126-8. PubMed ID: 7987106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical screening: Perceptions and barriers to uptake among Somali women in Camden.
    Abdullahi A; Copping J; Kessel A; Luck M; Bonell C
    Public Health; 2009 Oct; 123(10):680-5. PubMed ID: 19863980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
    Amery J; Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    Health Trends; 1992; 24(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 10123981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina.
    Arrossi S; Ramos S; Paolino M; Sankaranarayanan R
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 Nov; 16(32):50-8. PubMed ID: 19027622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences.
    Nicoll PM; Narayan KV; Paterson JG
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 May; 49(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 1917453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A family practice residency cervical screening project: perceived screening barriers.
    Branoff R; Santi K; Campbell JK; Roetzheim R; Oler M
    Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 9048173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promotion of cervical screening among nonattendees: a partial cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE; Carlsson PG
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 18090130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An audit of a cervical smear screening programme.
    Moodie PJ; Kljakovic M; McLeod DK
    N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):374-6. PubMed ID: 2797554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.