These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8255697)

  • 1. Four questions of time to contact: a critical examination of research on interceptive timing.
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1993; 22(6):653-80. PubMed ID: 8255697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action.
    Tresilian JR
    Perception; 1990; 19(2):223-39. PubMed ID: 2235289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.
    Tresilian JR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):865-76. PubMed ID: 1834797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of feedback in the accuracy of perceived direction of motion-in-depth and control of interceptive action.
    Gray R; Regan D; Castaneda B; Sieffert R
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1676-94. PubMed ID: 16169039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hitting a moving target: perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions.
    Tresilian JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 15912877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.
    Tresilian JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):231-45. PubMed ID: 7885822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing.
    Tresilian JR
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Apr; 61(3):515-28. PubMed ID: 10334098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of visual motion on interceptive actions and perception.
    Marinovic W; Plooy AM; Arnold DH
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():73-8. PubMed ID: 22480880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interceptive timing: prior knowledge matters.
    López-Moliner J; Field DT; Wann JP
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(13):11.1-8. PubMed ID: 17997639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intercepting free falling objects: better use Occam's razor than internalize Newton's law.
    Baurès R; Benguigui N; Amorim MA; Siegler IA
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2982-91. PubMed ID: 17884129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The utilisation of visual information in the control of rapid interceptive actions.
    Marinovic W; Plooy AM; Tresilian JR
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 19439399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balls to the wall: how acoustic information from a ball in motion guides interceptive movement in people with Parkinson's disease.
    Bieńkiewicz MM; Young WR; Craig CM
    Neuroscience; 2014 Sep; 275():508-18. PubMed ID: 24995419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three- to eight-month-old infants' catching under monocular and binocular vision.
    van Hof P; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Feb; 25(1):18-36. PubMed ID: 16242198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive plus online visual information optimizes temporal precision in interception.
    de la Malla C; López-Moliner J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1271-80. PubMed ID: 26076178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The processing of linear perspective and binocular information for action and perception.
    Bruggeman H; Yonas A; Konczak J
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1420-6. PubMed ID: 17166526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Object rotation effects on the timing of a hitting action.
    Scott MA; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ; Oudejans RR; Davids K
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2004 Jun; 75(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15209331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different strategies for using motion-in-depth information in catching.
    Gray R; Sieffert R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1004-22. PubMed ID: 16262495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time course of estimating time-to-contact: switching between sources of information.
    López-Moliner J; Supèr H; Keil MS
    Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():53-8. PubMed ID: 24075899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intercepting real and simulated falling objects: what is the difference?
    Baurès R; Benguigui N; Amorim MA; Hecht H
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Oct; 184(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19632274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation.
    Cavallo V; Laurent M
    Perception; 1988; 17(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 3249670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.