BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8256973)

  • 1. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research.
    Johnston ME; Langton KB; Haynes RB; Mathieu A
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jan; 120(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 8256973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
    Hunt DL; Haynes RB; Hanna SE; Smith K
    JAMA; 1998 Oct; 280(15):1339-46. PubMed ID: 9794315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcomes.
    Langton KB; Johnston ME; Haynes RB; Mathieu A
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1992; ():626-30. PubMed ID: 1482947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
    Garg AX; Adhikari NK; McDonald H; Rosas-Arellano MP; Devereaux PJ; Beyene J; Sam J; Haynes RB
    JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(10):1223-38. PubMed ID: 15755945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association of Clinician Diagnostic Performance With Machine Learning-Based Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review.
    Vasey B; Ursprung S; Beddoe B; Taylor EH; Marlow N; Bilbro N; Watkinson P; McCulloch P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e211276. PubMed ID: 33704476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
    Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients' outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review.
    Cleveringa FG; Gorter KJ; van den Donk M; van Gijsel J; Rutten GE
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Feb; 15(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 23360424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of clinical decision support systems for kidney-related drug prescribing: a systematic review.
    Tawadrous D; Shariff SZ; Haynes RB; Iansavichus AV; Jain AK; Garg AX
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2011 Dec; 58(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 21944664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals; effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
    Arditi C; Rège-Walther M; Wyatt JC; Durieux P; Burnand B
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Dec; 12():CD001175. PubMed ID: 23235578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical decision support provided within physician order entry systems: a systematic review of features effective for changing clinician behavior.
    Kawamoto K; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():361-5. PubMed ID: 14728195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems.
    Berlin A; Sorani M; Sim I
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):656-67. PubMed ID: 16442854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings.
    Jaspers MW; Smeulers M; Vermeulen H; Peute LW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011 May; 18(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 21422100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical decision support systems and antibiotic use.
    Shebl NA; Franklin BD; Barber N
    Pharm World Sci; 2007 Aug; 29(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 17458707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97.
    Mitchell E; Sullivan F
    BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7281):279-82. PubMed ID: 11157532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.
    Schwartz JM; Moy AJ; Rossetti SC; Elhadad N; Cato KD
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Mar; 28(3):653-663. PubMed ID: 33325504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Features predicting the success of computerized decision support for prescribing: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Mollon B; Chong J; Holbrook AM; Sung M; Thabane L; Foster G
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Feb; 9():11. PubMed ID: 19210782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
    Randell R; Mitchell N; Dowding D; Cullum N; Thompson C
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Oct; 12(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 17925077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.