These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8257646)

  • 21. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG; Moore BK; Swartz ML
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer-lined amalgam and composite restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Papadogianis Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 1996 Aug; 23(8):511-9. PubMed ID: 8866262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shear bond strength of dental amalgam bonded to dentin.
    Covey DA; Moon PC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Feb; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1900693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure.
    Ozcan M; Schoonbeek G; Gökçe B; Cömlekoglu E; Dündar M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 21180005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Oztürk B; Sengun A
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 10856807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The bonding of an adhesive resin cement to single and combined adherends encountered in resin-bonded bridge work: an in vitro study.
    Aboush YE; Jenkins CB
    Br Dent J; 1991 Sep; 171(6):166-9. PubMed ID: 1832915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bonding of amalgam to composite: tensile strength and morphology study.
    Garcia-Barbero AE; Garcia-Barbero J; Lopez-Calvo JA
    Dent Mater; 1994 Mar; 10(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7758853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adhesion of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may affect the integrity of tooth structure in the open sandwich technique.
    Czarnecka B; Kruszelnicki A; Kao A; Strykowska M; Nicholson JW
    Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e301-5. PubMed ID: 24950810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E; White SN
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.