These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8258585)

  • 1. Handling characteristics of gallium alloy for dental restoration.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Collard SM; Guo IY; Okabe T
    J Dent; 1993 Dec; 21(6):350-4. PubMed ID: 8258585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Kiremitci A; Bolay S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The physical properties of a gallium alloy restorative material.
    Blair FM; Whitworth JM; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 8621052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy].
    Yada I
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the mechanical properties of a gallium-based alloy with a spherical high-copper amalgam.
    Shaini FJ; Fleming GJ; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    Dent Mater; 2001 Mar; 17(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11163384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal leakage of Gallium Alloy root-end fillings: an in-vitro assessment.
    Whitworth JM; Khan AQ
    Int Endod J; 1995 Jul; 28(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 8595941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage in alloy-glass ionomer lined amalgam restorations after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Fisher MA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 2051252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Galvanic interaction between titanium and gallium alloy or dental amalgam.
    Horasawa N; Takahashi S; Marek M
    Dent Mater; 1999 Sep; 15(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 10863427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations.
    Mahler DB; Engle JH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Jan; 131(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.