These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259063)

  • 1. A comparison of an inductively coupled implanted coil with optimized surface coils for in vivo NMR imaging of the spinal cord.
    Wirth ED; Mareci TH; Beck BL; Fitzsimmons JR; Reier PJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Nov; 30(5):626-33. PubMed ID: 8259063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo 1H magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the rat spinal cord using an inductively-coupled chronically implanted RF coil.
    Silver X; Ni WX; Mercer EV; Beck BL; Bossart EL; Inglis B; Mareci TH
    Magn Reson Med; 2001 Dec; 46(6):1216-22. PubMed ID: 11746589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging using specialized coils.
    Fisher MR; Barker B; Amparo EG; Brandt G; Brant-Zawadzki M; Hricak H; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):443-7. PubMed ID: 4048453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal-to-noise ratio comparison between surface coils and implanted coils.
    Arnder LL; Shattuck MD; Black RD
    Magn Reson Med; 1996 May; 35(5):727-33. PubMed ID: 8722824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimized quadrature surface coil designs.
    Kumar A; Bottomley PA
    MAGMA; 2008 Mar; 21(1-2):41-52. PubMed ID: 18057975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise performance of surface coils for magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T.
    Hayes CE; Axel L
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(5):604-7. PubMed ID: 4046995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint in dogs and cats. Effect of different coils on image quality].
    Gäbler K; Brühschwein A; Loderstedt S; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 22143585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The NMR phased array.
    Roemer PB; Edelstein WA; Hayes CE; Souza SP; Mueller OM
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 Nov; 16(2):192-225. PubMed ID: 2266841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of rat spinal cord at 7 T using implantable RF coils.
    Bilgen M; Elshafiey I; Narayana PA
    Magn Reson Med; 2001 Dec; 46(6):1250-3. PubMed ID: 11746595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical considerations for the use of surface coils in MRI.
    Kulkarni MV; Patton JA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Aug; 147(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 3487956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximizing contrast to noise with inductively coupled implanted coils.
    Farmer TH; Cofer GP; Johnson GA
    Invest Radiol; 1990 May; 25(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 2345087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Surface coils in magnetic resonance diagnosis of spinal space-occupying lesions].
    Neuhold A; Frühwald F; Wicke L; Schwaighofer B
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Aug; 40(8):248-54. PubMed ID: 3629144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of nonuniformity in images of the spine and optic nerve from fixed receive-only surface coils at 1.5 T.
    Tofts PS; Barker GJ; Simmons A; MacManus DG; Thorpe J; Gass A; Miller DH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(6):997-1003. PubMed ID: 7962820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of a transmit/receive surface coil for squirrel monkey spinal cord imaging.
    Lu M; Wang F; Chen LM; Gore JC; Yan X
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():197-202. PubMed ID: 32087231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal-to-noise ratio versus field strength for small surface coils.
    Pohmann R; Avdievich NI; Scheffler K
    NMR Biomed; 2024 Oct; 37(10):e5168. PubMed ID: 38716493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ocular MR imaging: evaluation of different coil setups in a phantom study.
    Erb-Eigner K; Warmuth C; Taupitz M; Bertelmann E; Hamm B; Asbach P
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 23857153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface coil imaging of rat spine at 7.0 T.
    Banson ML; Cofer GP; Hedlund LW; Johnson GA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 10(6):929-34. PubMed ID: 1461090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of fetal cat neural tissue transplants in the adult cat spinal cord.
    Wirth ED; Theele DP; Mareci TH; Anderson DK; Brown SA; Reier PJ
    J Neurosurg; 1992 Feb; 76(2):261-74. PubMed ID: 1730955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal-to-noise ratio comparison of phased-array vs. implantable coil for rat spinal cord MRI.
    Yung AC; Kozlowski P
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 25(8):1215-21. PubMed ID: 17905249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative study of liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy quality at 3T using body and phased array coils with physical analysis and clinical evaluation.
    Xu L; Gu S; Feng Q; Liang C; Xin SX
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122999. PubMed ID: 25881016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.