99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259408)
1. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness.
Lindfors KK; Rosenquist CJ
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 8259408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.
Lindfors KK; McGahan MC; Rosenquist CJ; Hurlock GS
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):710-7. PubMed ID: 16569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device.
Kirshenbaum KJ; Voruganti T; Overbeeke C; Kirshenbaum MD; Patel P; Kaplan G; Maker V; August C; Cavallino RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 12876040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings.
Lee CH; Egglin TK; Philpotts L; Mainiero MB; Tocino I
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 9051045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective use of image-guided large-core needle biopsy of the breast: accuracy and cost-effectiveness.
Doyle AJ; Murray KA; Nelson EW; Bragg DG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 7618540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive, and cost effective.
Pettine S; Place R; Babu S; Williard W; Kim D; Carter P
Am J Surg; 1996 May; 171(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 8651388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer.
Whitten TM; Wallace TW; Bird RE; Turk PS
Am Surg; 1997 Dec; 63(12):1072-7; discussion 1077-8. PubMed ID: 9393255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The potential value of mammographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Masood S; Frykberg ER; Mitchum DG; McLellan GL; Scalapino MC; Bullard JB
Am Surg; 1989 Apr; 55(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 2705686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stereotaxic mammary core biopsy. II. Complementarity or competition with surgical biopsy].
Thiesse P; Guérin N; Treilleux I; Brémond A
Ann Chir; 1996; 50(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 8991203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years: analysis of cost-effectiveness.
Rosenquist CJ; Lindfors KK
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):647-50. PubMed ID: 8184041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.
Liberman L; Feng TL; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF
Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 9722851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency of Core Biopsy for BI-RADS-5 Breast Lesions.
Wolf R; Quan G; Calhoun K; Soot L; Skokan L
Breast J; 2008; 14(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18821933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer.
Lind DS; Minter R; Steinbach B; Abbitt P; Lanier L; Haigh L; Vauthey JN; Russin M; Hackett R; Copeland EM
J Surg Res; 1998 Jul; 78(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9733612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open-breast biopsy.
Groenewoud JH; Pijnappel RM; van den Akker-Van Marle ME; Birnie E; Buijs-van der Woude T; Mali WP; de Koning HJ; Buskens E
Br J Cancer; 2004 Jan; 90(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 14735181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
