187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259410)
1. Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model: comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US, and CT.
Gorczyca DP; DeBruhl ND; Ahn CY; Hoyt A; Sayre JW; Nudell P; McCombs M; Shaw WW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 8259410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography.
Berg WA; Caskey CI; Hamper UM; Anderson ND; Chang BW; Sheth S; Zerhouni EA; Kuhlman JE
Radiographics; 1993 Nov; 13(6):1323-36. PubMed ID: 8290727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single- and double- lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria.
Berg WA; Caskey CI; Hamper UM; Kuhlman JE; Anderson ND; Chang BW; Sheth S; Zerhouni EA
Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 7568852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging.
Gorczyca DP; Schneider E; DeBruhl ND; Foo TK; Ahn CY; Sayre JW; Shaw WW; Bassett LW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):305-10. PubMed ID: 8310916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques.
Everson LI; Parantainen H; Detlie T; Stillman AE; Olson PN; Landis G; Foshager MC; Cunningham B; Griffiths HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 8010248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants: value of a silicone-selective pulse sequence.
Monticciolo DL; Nelson RC; Dixon WT; Bostwick J; Mukundan S; Hester TR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 8010247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic, and histopathologic findings.
Caskey CI; Berg WA; Hamper UM; Sheth S; Chang BW; Anderson ND
Radiographics; 1999 Oct; 19 Spec No():S39-51; quiz S261-2. PubMed ID: 10517442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Silicone breast implants: US evaluation.
DeBruhl ND; Gorczyca DP; Ahn CY; Shaw WW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 8372224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Silicone implant rupture: detection with US.
Harris KM; Ganott MA; Shestak KC; Losken HW; Tobon H
Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):761-8. PubMed ID: 8497626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multimodality Imaging-based Evaluation of Single-Lumen Silicone Breast Implants for Rupture.
Seiler SJ; Sharma PB; Hayes JC; Ganti R; Mootz AR; Eads ED; Teotia SS; Evans WP
Radiographics; 2017; 37(2):366-382. PubMed ID: 28186859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings.
Mund DF; Farria DM; Gorczyca DP; DeBruhl ND; Ahn CY; Shaw WW; Bassett LW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8372755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linguine sign at MR imaging: does it represent the collapsed silicone implant shell?
Gorczyca DP; DeBruhl ND; Mund DF; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):576-7. PubMed ID: 8153345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging.
Gorczyca DP; Sinha S; Ahn CY; DeBruhl ND; Hayes MK; Gausche VR; Shaw WW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):407-10. PubMed ID: 1410346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis.
Dowden R
Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Jul; 43(1):99-100. PubMed ID: 10402997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound.
Ikeda DM; Borofsky HB; Herfkens RJ; Sawyer-Glover AM; Birdwell RL; Glover GH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Dec; 104(7):2054-62. PubMed ID: 11149768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast implant rupture: diagnosis with US.
Caskey CI; Berg WA; Anderson ND; Sheth S; Chang BW; Hamper UM
Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):819-23. PubMed ID: 8115633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic tomography in diagnosis of breast implant rupture].
Kvistad KA; Smenes E; Thuomas KA; Gribbestad IS; Samdal F
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Sep; 117(22):3226-8. PubMed ID: 9411862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging spectrum of breast implant complications: mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
O'Toole M; Caskey CI
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2000 Oct; 21(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 11071616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: A retrospective observational study of 367 cases.
Goldammer F; Pinsolle V; Dissaux C; Pélissier P
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2021 Feb; 66(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 32988663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
