These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8259425)

  • 21. Does advanced cirrhosis with portosystemic shunting affect the value of CT arterial portography in the evaluation of the liver?
    Oliver JH; Baron RL; Dodd GD; Peterson MS; Carr BI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 7839964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of pharmacokinetics to electron-beam tomography of the abdomen.
    Krause W; Gröll R; Kern R; Baumgartner C; Rienmüller R
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):487-95. PubMed ID: 10480045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal scan delay of arterial phase scanning of hepatic CT using a real-time image reconstruction system.
    Shimizu T; Misaki T; Yamamoto K; Tanaka Y; Utsunomiya K; Sueyoshi K; Narabayashi I
    Clin Imaging; 1999; 23(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 10416087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Effect of contrast material pushed with saline solution using dual injection on enhancement of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma in multislice CT of the liver].
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 63(8):409-11. PubMed ID: 14587411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Blood supply of liver metastasis].
    Li Zg; Huang Jx; Li Sz; Zhao Jj; Shi Gf; Liang Gq; Wang Hg; Han Py; Wang Q; Gu Ts
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Apr; 40(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 18458688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Usefulness of saline pushing in reduction of contrast material dose in abdominal CT: evaluation of time-density curve for the aorta, portal vein and liver.
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Inada Y; Nakai G; Tanikake M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):231-4. PubMed ID: 17038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT.
    Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Yokoyama R; Miyoshi T; Kato H; Tsuge Y; Shiratori Y; Hoshi H; Onozuka M; Moriyama N; Bae KT
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):167-74. PubMed ID: 16990676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CT arterial portography: causes of technical failure and variable liver enhancement.
    Paulson EK; Baker ME; Hilleren DJ; Jones WP; Knelson MH; Nadel SN; Leder RA; Meyers WC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):745-9. PubMed ID: 1326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computed tomography perfusion of the liver: assessment of pure portal blood flow studied with CT perfusion during superior mesenteric arterial portography.
    Kojima H; Tanigawa N; Komemushi A; Kariya S; Sawada S
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Nov; 45(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 15624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The optimal temporal window for CT of the liver using a time-density analysis: implications for helical (spiral) CT.
    Silverman PM; Cooper C; Trock B; Garra BS; Davros WJ; Zeman RK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 7822552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Ogata I; Nishiharu T; Urata J; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):753-7. PubMed ID: 8751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Overestimating the size of hepatic malignancy on helical CT during arterial portography: equilibrium phase CT and pathology.
    Kanematsu M; Hoshi H; Yamada T; Nandate Y; Kato M; Yokoyama R; Murakami T; Nakamura H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):713-9. PubMed ID: 9294557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [CT portography in malignant space-occupying lesions of the liver].
    Köster O; Harder T; Steudel A; Sommer HJ
    Rofo; 1989 Feb; 150(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 2537509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [CT arteriography of hepatic tumors].
    Tamura S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Aug; 59(9):435-40. PubMed ID: 10487054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimizing liver contrast in helical liver CT: value of a real-time bolus-triggering technique.
    Dinkel HP; Fieger M; Knüpffer J; Moll R; Schindler G
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(9):1608-12. PubMed ID: 9866771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Intraindividual Contrast Enhancement Variability for Determining the Maximum Achievable Consistency in CT.
    Johnson DY; Farjat AE; Vernuccio F; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC; Marin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 31573858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease.
    Furuta A; Ito K; Fujita T; Koike S; Shimizu A; Matsunaga N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 15208131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT during arterial portography for the preoperative evaluation of hepatic tumors: how, when, and why?
    Soyer P; Bluemke DA; Fishman EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 7992722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hepatic arterioportal shunts not directly related to hepatocellular carcinoma: findings on CT during hepatic arteriography, CT arterial portography and dual phase spiral CT.
    Park CM; Cha SH; Kim DH; Choi JA; Cha IH; Kim YH; Chung KB; Suh WH
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 10873693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Timing of the hepatic arterial phase during contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the liver: assessment of normal values in 25 volunteers.
    Bader TR; Prokesch RW; Grabenwöger F
    Invest Radiol; 2000 Aug; 35(8):486-92. PubMed ID: 10946976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.